AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compares the effectiveness of paliperidone palmitate 6-month (PP6M) injectable treatment for schizophrenia to a real-world external comparator arm (ECA) using patients on different dosing schedules (PP1M or PP3M).
  • At 24 months, the relapse rate was significantly lower in the PP6M group (3.9%) compared to the ECA (15.6%), and the time to relapse was longer for PP6M patients.
  • Overall, the findings indicate that the PP6M formulation is more effective at reducing and delaying relapses and controlling symptoms compared to shorter dosing schedules in typical care settings.

Article Abstract

Background: The paliperidone palmitate 6-month (PP6M) long-acting injectable formulation is currently the longest dosing interval available for schizophrenia treatment.

Objective: To compare treatment outcomes between a real-world external comparator arm (ECA; NeuroBlu database) and the PP6M open-label extension (OLE) clinical trial arm.

Methods: The ECA comprised patients receiving PP 1-month (PP1M) or PP 3-month (PP3M) for ⩾12 months without a relapse. The PP6M OLE arm included patients with PP1M treatment prior to randomization who completed the 12-month double-blind PP6M study on either PP3M or PP6M relapse-free. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to study time-to-relapse (primary outcome) and change in Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) score (secondary outcome).

Results: At 24 months, 3.9% (7/178) of patients in the PP6M cohort experienced a relapse 15.6% (26/167) in the ECA. Time-to-relapse was longer in the PP6M cohort the ECA at 12-, 18-, and 24-months across the different weighting methods; median time-to-relapse was not reached in both cohorts. Hazard ratio (HR) for relapse was significantly lower for the PP6M cohort the ECA throughout the duration of the study [HR at 24 months: 0.18 (95% CI: 0.08-0.42),  < 0.001]. At 24 months, change in CGI-S score for the PP6M cohort was 0.76 points lower than the ECA ( < 0.001). Results were similar in a sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching (PSM); IPTW resulted in larger sample sizes in balanced dataset than PSM.

Conclusion: Consistent findings across weighting and matching methods suggest PP6M efficacy in reducing and delaying relapses and long-term symptom control compared to PP1M/PP3M in usual-care settings. Additional confounds, such as greater illness severity and more frequent comorbidities and comedications in the ECA, were not fully controlled by the applied statistical methods. Future real-world studies directly comparing PP6M with PP3M/PP1M and adjusting for these confounders are warranted.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10541743PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20451253231200258DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

paliperidone palmitate
12
pp6m cohort
12
palmitate 6-month
8
real-world external
8
external comparator
8
comparator arm
8
pp6m
8
cohort eca
8
eca
5
comparative effectiveness
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!