Six ways of failing to see (and why the differences matter).

Iperception

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Published: September 2023

Sometimes we look but fail to see: our car keys on a cluttered desk, a repeated word in a carefully proofread email, or a motorcycle at an intersection. Wolfe and colleagues present a unifying, mechanistic framework for understanding these "Looked But Failed to See" errors, explaining how such misses arise from natural constraints on human visual processing. Here, we offer a conceptual taxonomy of six distinct ways we might be said to fail to see, and explore: how these relate to processes in Wolfe et al.'s model; how they can be distinguished experimentally; and, why the differences matter.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10536858PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20416695231198762DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

differences matter
8
ways failing
4
failing differences
4
matter fail
4
fail car
4
car keys
4
keys cluttered
4
cluttered desk
4
desk repeated
4
repeated word
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!