Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors have transformed the treatment landscape of patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancers. However, despite improvements in clinical outcomes, the approximately 70% of patients with tumors that are not intrinsically resistant to a CDK4/6 inhibitor still ultimately acquire resistance, which leads to a dilemma for clinicians when deciding which treatment to offer patients when they demonstrate disease progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor. As such, many groups have sought to understand the mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors, mostly focusing on genetic alterations associated with resistance. Though several recurrent mutations have been described, they are not consistent enough to guide clinical practice or generate novel rational treatment options. Two recent publications have used transcriptomic analysis to unravel distinct mechanisms driving resistance to individual CDK4/6 inhibitors and in doing so have identified biomarkers that could potentially help identify the next course of treatment for patients following disease progression.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-23-2608 | DOI Listing |
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
January 2025
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, 05505, Korea.
Purpose: Estrogen receptor (ER) expression and heterogeneity affect endocrine therapy efficacy. F-fluoroestradiol (F-FES) PET/CT is an effective non-invasive method to analyze systemic ER expression. This study aimed to examine the predictive/prognostic value of F-FES PET/CT for patients treated with endocrine therapy plus cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Adv Pract Oncol
July 2024
From Carolina Oncology Specialists, Hickory, North Carolina.
The standard adjuvant treatment of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer (EBC) is endocrine therapy (ET). Despite this treatment, 20% of patients will have their disease recur. Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors with ET have shown overall survival (OS) benefit in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer in the metastatic setting.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Drug Investig
January 2025
Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, 560 Ray C Hunt Dr., Room 2107, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Background And Objective: Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) significantly enhance progression-free survival and overall survival in patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, they are highly expensive, and their economic impact has not been fully evaluated. This is a retrospective secondary analysis evaluating the cost effectiveness of these drugs, differentiating between medication-related and non-medication costs from a healthcare perspective.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Med
December 2024
Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara 06800, Turkey.
: Although CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapies have improved outcomes in HR+ HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, predictive biomarkers for treatment response and adverse effects remain limited. This study assessed the prognostic and predictive value of large unstained cells (LUC), a subset of white blood cells that may reflect immune status or treatment response. : A retrospective analysis of 210 patients with HR+ HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors between 2021 and 2024 was conducted.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancers (Basel)
December 2024
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital and Brown University Health, Providence, RI 02903, USA.
In hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancers, a growing number of revolutionary personalized therapies are in clinical use or trials, such as CDK4/6 inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and PIK3CA inhibitors. Those treatment options are largely driven by the presence or absence of genomic alterations in the tumor. Therefore, molecular profiling is often performed during disease progression.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!