Limited Durability of Extensor Mechanism Reconstruction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: Mesh and Allograft Show Equivalent Outcomes at Five-Year Follow-Up.

Background: Extensor mechanism disruption is a challenging complication following total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between patients who received mesh versus allograft extensor mechanism reconstruction.

Methods: All patients who underwent extensor mechanism reconstruction at a single institution were screened. Demographic and surgical variables were recorded, including technique (ie, synthetic mesh versus allograft reconstruction). Patients were assessed for preoperative and postoperative extensor lag, revision, and duration of follow-up. Analyses, including Kaplan-Meier survivorships, were performed to compare mesh to allograft reconstruction. In total, 50 extensor mechanism reconstructions (30 mesh and 20 allograft) were conducted between January 1st, 2001, and December 31st, 2022.

Results: There were no differences between the cohorts with respect to revision (26.7 [8 of 30] versus 35.0% [7 of 20], P = .680) or failure defined as above knee amputation or fusion (6.7 [2 of 30] versus 5.0% [1 of 20], P = .808). There were also no differences in time to reoperation (average 27 months [range, 6.7 to 58.8] versus 29 months [range, 1.2 to 84.9], P = .910) or in postoperative extensor lag among patients who did not undergo a reoperation (13 [0 to 50] versus 11° [0 to 30], P = .921). The estimated 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival with extensor mechanism revision as the endpoint was similar between the 2 groups (52.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 25.4 to 73.3 versus 55.0%, 95% CI = 23.0 to 78.4%, P = .990).

Conclusions: The purpose of this study was to present the findings of a large cohort of patients who required extensor mechanism reconstruction. Regardless of the reconstruction type, the 5-year outcomes of patients requiring extensor mechanism reconstruction are suboptimal.