A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Prenatal ultrasound screening and congenital anomalies at birth by region: Pattern and distribution in Latvia. | LitMetric

Objective: The objective was to compare the ultrasound scan frequency and rate of congenital malformations between urban and rural areas.

Study Design: We conducted a population-based retrospective study using linked data from administrative data sources and register data. All singleton live births in 2018 that could be linked (n = 18,759) were included in the data analysis. Place of residence was categorized into three groups: Riga (capital city), other big cities and rural areas (including regional cities). Adjusted ORs were calculated. The multiple regression model was adjusted for maternal age, living area and prenatal screenings.

Results: Overall, 3% (n = 536) of the live-born infants were reported to have congenital malformations at birth. The proportion of congenital anomalies was, on average, 2% higher (p < 0.001) in Riga (4%, n = 334) than in the rural regions (2%, n = 93) and other cities (1%, n = 109). Women whose infants had congenital anomalies at birth had higher and statistically significant odds of having abnormal findings on ultrasound (US) screening (OR=2.3; 95% CI 1.5-3.4; p < 0.001) and undergoing invasive diagnostic tests during pregnancy (OR=2.2; 95% CI 1.4-3.5; p < 0.001). The median number of ultrasound scans during pregnancy was 3 (IQR 2) in Riga and 4 (IQR 2) in the other cities and rural regions. The top 3 types of congenital anomalies at birth were deformations of the musculoskeletal system and congenital malformations of the circulatory system and genital organs.

Conclusions: The findings of this study showed a statistically significant association between the rate of foetal anomalies and the frequency of prenatal examinations. A higher average number of US examinations per pregnancy was observed in the rural regions. Regional variations exist in the rates of specific congenital anomalies. Further studies are recommended in this field for better understanding. Surveillance systems that are able to analyse the efficiency of US examinations need to be developed for the early prenatal detection of congenital anomalies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10522966PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100242DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

congenital anomalies
8
congenital malformations
8
prenatal ultrasound
4
ultrasound screening
4
congenital
4
screening congenital
4
anomalies birth
4
birth region
4
region pattern
4
pattern distribution
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!