Background: Interproximal enamel reduction (IPR) is a clinical procedure which involves reduction and anatomic recontouring of interproximal surfaces of enamel as a method of gaining space. The biological effects related to this clinical procedure have long been discussed. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the enamel reduction efficiency and the effects on enamel surfaces of the oscillating mechanical system for interproximal enamel reduction (IPR).
Methods: Fifteen complete oscillating IPR sequences included one opener (0.1 mm), two metallic strips for active IPR phase (0.2 and 0.3 mm), three resin strips for active and initial polishing phases (0.4 and 0.5 mm), and one resin strip for polishing phase (0.15 mm). Sequences were selected and tested on fifteen freshly extracted teeth by means of tribological tests with alternative dry-sliding motion (Linear Reciprocating Tribometer; C.S.M. Instruments, Peseaux, Switzerland). A 3D analysis of treated surfaces was performed by using a TayMap software. Then, enamel surfaces were qualitatively evaluated before and after the tribological analysis, with a FEI Quanta 200 (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) in high vacuum at 30.00 kV. Images were acquired at a 30×, 100× and 300× magnification.
Results: Minimum surface irregularities were observed on all treated enamel surfaces when compared with untreated ones. The 3D analysis showed a uniform wear pattern after tribological tests. Meanwhile, the SEM analysis revealed smooth and regular wear lines on treated surfaces after the entire mechanical IPR sequence. The macroscopic irregularities illustrated can be considered similar to those of untreated surfaces.
Conclusions: The adoption of a standardized oscillating IPR sequence allows an efficient reduction of the interproximal enamel, leaving regular and harmonious surfaces. Adequate polishing procedures should always be performed at the end of active IPR phases in order to guarantee a good long-term prognosis and proper respect of biological structures.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6329.23.04815-5 | DOI Listing |
J Chem Phys
September 2024
Department of Physics, Umeå University, 901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Turk J Orthod
March 2024
Başkent University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Ankara, Turkey.
Objective: To compare the consistency of two interproximal reduction (IPR) methods in terms of the amount of planned and performed IPR during clear aligner therapy (CAT).
Methods: Thirty-four patients who received IPR using hand-operated abrasive strips (Group 1, 20 patients, 162 teeth) and motor-driven 3/4 oscillating segmental disks (Group 2, 14 patients, 134 teeth) during CAT were included in this preliminary study. The consistency between the planned and performed IPR amounts was evaluated within and between groups for teeth and quadrants.
Objectives: To evaluate wear and friction properties of oscillating strips in order to validate the importance of a standardized interproximal enamel reduction (IPR) sequence to preserve their efficiency and lifetime.
Materials And Methods: Fifteen complete oscillating IPR sequences were tested by means of tribological tests (Linear Reciprocating Tribometer, C.S.
Clin Oral Investig
January 2024
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Başkent University, Yukarıbahçelievler Mah. 82. Sokak No. 26 06490, Bahçelievler, Ankara, Turkey.
Objectives: To comparatively assess 3 interproximal reduction (IPR) methods used in clear aligner treatment with regard to accuracy, and patient perception of discomfort and anxiety.
Materials And Methods: A total of 42 patients, treated with the Invisalign® system, were included in this prospective trial and received one of the following IPR methods: hand-operated abrasive strips (group 1; 14 patients, 150 teeth), motor-driven 3/4 oscillating segmental discs (group 2; 14 patients, 134 teeth), or motor-driven abrasive strips (group 3; 14 patients, 133 teeth). Accuracy was evaluated using the difference between planned and executed IPR.
Phys Chem Chem Phys
February 2024
Chemistry Department, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201-1881, USA.
An updated version of the CO + CO potential energy surface from [R. Dawes, X. G.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!