Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: Periodontitis is a highly prevalent oral disease characterized by irreversible bone resorption and tooth loss. The proliferation, migration and osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cell (PDLSC) are crucial to the regeneration of periodontal bone defects. There is increasing evidence that small extracellular vesicle (sEV) derived from pulp stem cell, including human exfoliated deciduous teeth stem cell (SHED) and human dental pulp stem cell (DPSC), is a potential mediator for bone tissue regeneration. However, which one is more suitable for periodontal bone formation still remains to be studied.
Methods: In this study, NTA and BCA were performed to compare the productivity of sEV derived from SHED (SHED-sEV) and sEV derived from DPSC (DPSC-sEV). CCK-8, transwell assay, alkaline phosphatase staining and activity assay, alizarin red staining, qRT-PCR, and western blotting were conducted to detect the proliferation, migration, and osteogenesis of PDLSCs coculturing with SHED-sEV or DPSC-sEV.
Results: The secretory efficiency of SHED-sEV was much higher than that of DPSC-sEV. The cellular uptake of sEVs could promote the proliferation, migration and osteogenesis of DPLSCs. Compared with DPSC-sEV, SHED-sEV showed better ability in such promotion.
Conclusions: SHED-sEV showed higher productivity and better osteogenic induction ability than DPSC-sEV. Thus, SHED-sEV may be a more promising candidate for periodontal bone regeneration.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520277 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.reth.2023.09.009 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!