Stop me if you've heard this one before: The Chomskyan hammer and the Skinnerian nail.

The target article signal boosts important ongoing work across the cognitive sciences. However, its theoretical claims, generative value, and purported contributions are - where not simply restatements of arguments extensively explored elsewhere - imprecise, noncommittal, and underdeveloped to a degree that makes them difficult to evaluate. The article's apparent force results from engaging with straw rather than steel opponents.