A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Smartphone-Based LiDAR Application for Easy and Accurate Wound Size Measurement. | LitMetric

Smartphone-Based LiDAR Application for Easy and Accurate Wound Size Measurement.

J Clin Med

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon 35015, Republic of Korea.

Published: September 2023

The accurate assessment of wound size is a critical step in advanced wound care management. This study aims to introduce and validate a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) technique for measuring wound size. Twenty-eight wounds treated from December 2022 to April 2023 at the Chungnam National University Hospital were analyzed. All the wounds were measured using three techniques: conventional ruler methods, the LiDAR technique, and ImageJ analysis. Correlation analysis, linear regression, and Bland-Altman plot analysis were performed to validate the accuracy of the novel method. The measurement results (mean ± standard deviation) obtained using the ruler method, LiDAR technique, and ImageJ analysis were 112.99 ± 110.07 cm, 73.59 ± 72.97 cm, and 74.29 ± 72.15 cm, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficient was higher for the LiDAR application (0.995) than for the conventional ruler methods (mean difference, -5.0000 cm), as was the degree of agreement (mean difference, 38.6933 cm). Wound size measurement using LiDAR is a simple and reliable method that will enable practitioners to conveniently assess wounds with a flattened and irregular shape with higher accuracy. However, non-flattened wounds cannot be assessed owing to the technical limitations of LiDAR.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10531604PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12186042DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wound size
16
lidar technique
12
lidar application
8
size measurement
8
conventional ruler
8
ruler methods
8
technique imagej
8
imagej analysis
8
lidar
6
wound
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!