AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examined how the positioning of electrode contacts in cochlear implant recipients affects their ability to recognize speech, especially for those using electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS).
  • Sixty percent of participants had electrode contacts within their functional acoustic hearing range, but this was not linked to better speech recognition in quiet settings.
  • However, closer alignment between the most apical electrode contact and the upper edge of residual hearing improved speech recognition in noisy environments, indicating that electrode placement can impact outcomes for EAS users.

Article Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the incidence of electrode contacts within the functional acoustic hearing region in cochlear implant (CI) recipients and to assess its influence on speech recognition for electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) users.

Study Design: Retrospective review.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

Patients: One hundred five CI recipients with functional acoustic hearing preservation (≤80 dB HL at 250 Hz).

Interventions: Cochlear implantation with a 24-, 28-, or 31.5-mm lateral wall electrode array.

Main Outcome Measures: Angular insertion depth (AID) of individual contacts was determined from imaging. Unaided acoustic thresholds and AID were used to calculate the proximity of contacts to the functional acoustic hearing region. The association between proximity values and speech recognition in quiet and noise for EAS users at 6 months postactivation was reviewed.

Results: Sixty percent of cases had one or more contacts within the functional acoustic hearing region. Proximity was not significantly associated with speech recognition in quiet. Better performance in noise was observed for cases with close correspondence between the most apical contact and the upper edge of residual hearing, with poorer results for increasing proximity values in either the basal or apical direction ( r14 = 0.48, p = 0.043; r18 = -0.41, p = 0.045, respectively).

Conclusion: There was a high incidence of electrode contacts within the functional acoustic hearing region, which is not accounted for with default mapping procedures. The variability in outcomes across EAS users with default maps may be due in part to electric-on-acoustic interference, electric frequency-to-place mismatch, and/or failure to stimulate regions intermediate between the most apical electrode contact and the functional acoustic hearing region.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10840620PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

functional acoustic
28
acoustic hearing
28
hearing region
24
contacts functional
20
speech recognition
16
electrode contacts
12
cochlear implant
8
acoustic
8
hearing
8
influence speech
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!