The purpose of this study is a new method that can help to identify the sex through the study of palatal rugae, comparing sagittal sections of the hard palate using Cartesian coordinates and evaluating the assistance given by digital technology and its applicability in this method. In this study, 57 digital impressions were examined and divided in two groups based on sex. Results: 2223 impression sections were studied and 145 coordinates that were present with a frequency greater than 50% in one or both groups were obtained: 52 discriminating traits (DT) in the male group, 29 discriminating traits in the female group, and 64 common traits (CT). The DTs in the female group showed no statistically significant difference from the same coordinates in the male one ( = 0.832). Statistically significant differences were observed in the DTs in the male group compared to the same coordinates in the female group ( = 0.018). No statistically significant differences were observed in the frequency of DTs in both sexes ( = 0.056). Further research in forensic odontology is needed to determine its scientific certainty. It is certain that digital technology may one day be a valuable support for the forensic odontologist but to date the lack of dedicated and certified programs limits its reliability.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10528044PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj11090204DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

female group
12
palatal rugae
8
digital technology
8
discriminating traits
8
male group
8
statistically differences
8
differences observed
8
group
5
rugae discriminating
4
discriminating factor
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!