A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Ceftobiprole for Treatment of Complicated Bacteremia. | LitMetric

Ceftobiprole for Treatment of Complicated Bacteremia.

N Engl J Med

From the Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University (T.L.H., N.A.T., V.G.F.), and Duke Clinical Research Institute (T.L.H., V.G.F.) - both in Durham, NC; the Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore (S.E.C.); the Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (S.B.D.); the Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Denver Health, Denver (T.C.J.); Tufts Medicine and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston (H.W.B.); Zaycev V.T. Institute of General and Emergency Surgery of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine, Kharkiv (O.P.), Regional Clinical Hospital, Ivano-Frankivsk Regional Council, Ivano-Frankivsk (I.T.), and Dnipropetrovsk I.I. Mechnikov Regional Clinical Hospital, Dnipro (S.K.) - all in Ukraine; Eurohospital Plovdiv, Plovdiv (B.A.), and University Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment and Emergency Medicine "N.I. Pirogov," Clinic of Purulent-Septic Surgery, Sofia (I.P.) - both in Bulgaria; LTD Academician Vakhtang Bochorishvili Clinic, Tbilisi, Georgia (M.M.); N.I. Pirogov City Clinical Hospital No. 1, Moscow (A.A.); the Department of Medicine and Division of Infectious Diseases, Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas, Buenos Aires (M.E.S.); Basilea Pharmaceutica International, Allschwil, Switzerland (M.A.G., M.E., K.H., D.I., M.J., M.S., J.S.); and the Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology, and Hygiene, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, and the German Center for Infection Research, Partner Site Bonn-Cologne - both in Cologne, Germany (H.S.).

Published: October 2023

Background: Ceftobiprole is a cephalosporin that may be effective for treating complicated bacteremia, including methicillin-resistant .

Methods: In this phase 3, double-blind, double-dummy, noninferiority trial, adults with complicated bacteremia were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive ceftobiprole at a dose of 500 mg intravenously every 6 hours for 8 days and every 8 hours thereafter, or daptomycin at a dose of 6 to 10 mg per kilogram of body weight intravenously every 24 hours plus optional aztreonam (at the discretion of the trial-site investigators). The primary outcome, overall treatment success 70 days after randomization (defined as survival, bacteremia clearance, symptom improvement, no new bacteremia-related complications, and no receipt of other potentially effective antibiotics), with a noninferiority margin of 15%, was adjudicated by a data review committee whose members were unaware of the trial-group assignments. Safety was also assessed.

Results: Of 390 patients who underwent randomization, 387 (189 in the ceftobiprole group and 198 in the daptomycin group) had confirmed bacteremia and received ceftobiprole or daptomycin (modified intention-to-treat population). A total of 132 of 189 patients (69.8%) in the ceftobiprole group and 136 of 198 patients (68.7%) in the daptomycin group had overall treatment success (adjusted difference, 2.0 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -7.1 to 11.1). Findings appeared to be consistent between the ceftobiprole and daptomycin groups in key subgroups and with respect to secondary outcomes, including mortality (9.0% and 9.1%, respectively; 95% CI, -6.2 to 5.2) and the percentage of patients with microbiologic eradication (82.0% and 77.3%; 95% CI, -2.9 to 13.0). Adverse events were reported in 121 of 191 patients (63.4%) who received ceftobiprole and 117 of 198 patients (59.1%) who received daptomycin; serious adverse events were reported in 36 patients (18.8%) and 45 patients (22.7%), respectively. Gastrointestinal adverse events (primarily mild nausea) were more frequent with ceftobiprole.

Conclusions: Ceftobiprole was noninferior to daptomycin with respect to overall treatment success in patients with complicated bacteremia. (Funded by Basilea Pharmaceutica International and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; ERADICATE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03138733.).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2300220DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

complicated bacteremia
16
treatment success
12
adverse events
12
ceftobiprole
9
patients
9
intravenously hours
8
ceftobiprole group
8
daptomycin group
8
received ceftobiprole
8
ceftobiprole daptomycin
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!