Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The use of soft X-rays in electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) has gained renewed interest over the past decades due to the advent of new detector technologies. Because X-ray absorption is the dominant correction for soft X-rays, a reliable set of mass attenuation coefficients (MACs) is needed for accurate composition determination. Although several MAC tabulations cover the soft X-ray range, the accuracy of such tabulations below 1 keV is not firmly established. In this study, we assess the accuracy of MAC tabulations in the soft X-ray region by comparing tabulated values for Be, B, C, N, O, and F Kα X-rays with experimental data available in the literature. We find that the 1993 semi-empirical MAC compilation of Henke et al. [(1993). Low-energy X-ray interaction coefficients: Photoabsorption, scattering, transmission and reflection at E=50-30000 eV, Z=1-92. Atom Data Nucl Data Tables54, 181-342] and the more recent theoretical MAC calculations of Sabbatucci and Salvat [(2016). Theory and calculation of the atomic photoeffect. Rad Phys Chem121, 122-140] perform slightly better than the rest of the considered tabulations. The Sabbatucci-Salvat dataset also provides the best agreement with the few existing experimental measurements for Al L2,3M X-rays.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/micmic/ozac045 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!