Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Differentiating between a pituitary from an ectopic source of ACTH could be a real one of the major challenges of clinical endocrinology. The Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS) is considered the gold standard for identifying the source of ACTH; however, is not available worldwide. After the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, algorithms that include biochemical and imaging tests have gained importance as an alternative to BIPSS. This review summarizes the drawbacks in the differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing; the evolution of diagnostic tests, and the evidence that exists on their performance. As well as a comparison between the advantages and disadvantages of invasive and non-invasive tests.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2023.102882 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!