A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The use of ultrasonography as an effective screening tool for chronic posterior cruciate ligament injuries. | LitMetric

The use of ultrasonography as an effective screening tool for chronic posterior cruciate ligament injuries.

J Med Ultrason (2001)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa, 920-0934, Japan.

Published: January 2024

Purpose: We aimed to explore the applicability and validity of ultrasonography for diagnosing chronic posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries.

Methods: PCL thickness was measured at 2 cm proximal to the tibia insertion site. Using the same ultrasonography image, the angle tangent to the PCL from the tibia insertion site was also measured. These data were analyzed by plotting the receiver operating curve (ROC), and the sensitivity and specificity were calculated according to the optimal cut-off point. Ultrasonography data from the PCLinjured knee were compared with those from the contralateral uninjured knee of the same patient.

Results: Twelve men and six women, with a mean age of 28.8 ± 14.0 years, were included in this study. The mean time from injury to medical examination was 10.0 ± 6.7 months. The mean thickness of the PCL was 8.1 ± 1.9 mm on the affected side and 5.8 ± 1.2 mm on the uninjured side, with the affected side being significantly thicker. ROC analysis revealed that the optimal cut-off value for the thickness of chronic PCL injuries was 6.5 mm (sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 77.8%, area under the curve [AUC] = 0.87). The optimal cut-off value for the angle was 20° (sensitivity 88.9%, specificity 94.4%, AUC = 0.96).

Conclusion: Ultrasonography is useful as a screening tool for chronic PCL injuries. The optimal cut-off point was 6.5 mm for thickness and 20° for angle.

Level Of Evidence: IV.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10894112PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10396-023-01366-zDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

optimal cut-off
16
screening tool
8
tool chronic
8
chronic posterior
8
posterior cruciate
8
cruciate ligament
8
tibia insertion
8
insertion site
8
cut-off point
8
chronic pcl
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!