AI Article Synopsis

  • * A total of 193 patients were randomized into two groups: one with immune monitoring and the other receiving standard prophylaxis for set periods (180 or 90 days).
  • * Results showed that while immune monitoring significantly reduced the duration of antiviral treatment by about 26 days, it did not demonstrate a clear advantage in preventing clinically significant CMV infections when compared to the control group.

Article Abstract

Background: The use of assays detecting cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T cell-mediated immunity may individualize the duration of antiviral prophylaxis after transplantation.

Methods: In this randomized trial, kidney and liver transplant recipients from 6 centers in Switzerland were enrolled if they were CMV-seronegative with seropositive donors or CMV-seropositive receiving antithymocyte globulins. Patients were randomized to a duration of antiviral prophylaxis based on immune monitoring (intervention) or a fixed duration (control). Patients in the control group were planned to receive 180 days (CMV-seronegative) or 90 days (CMV-seropositive) of valganciclovir. Patients were assessed monthly with a CMV ELISpot assay (T-Track CMV); prophylaxis in the intervention group was stopped if the assay was positive. The co-primary outcomes were the proportion of patients with clinically significant CMV infection and reduction in days of prophylaxis. Between-group differences were adjusted for CMV serostatus.

Results: Overall, 193 patients were randomized (92 in the immune-monitoring group and 101 in the control group), of whom 185 had evaluation of the primary outcome (87 and 98 patients). CMV infection occurred in 26 of 87 (adjusted percentage, 30.9%) in the immune-monitoring group and in 32 of 98 (adjusted percentage, 31.1%) in the control group (adjusted risk difference, -0.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], -13.0% to 12.7%; P = .064). The duration of prophylaxis was shorter in the immune-monitoring group (adjusted difference, -26.0 days; 95%, CI, -41.1 to -10.8 days; P < .001).

Conclusions: Immune monitoring resulted in a significant reduction of antiviral prophylaxis, but we were unable to establish noninferiority of this approach on the co-primary outcome of CMV infection.

Clinical Trials Registration: NCT02538172.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10874264PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad575DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

antiviral prophylaxis
16
duration antiviral
12
control group
12
immune-monitoring group
12
group adjusted
12
fixed duration
8
transplant recipients
8
patients randomized
8
immune monitoring
8
cmv infection
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!