AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study investigates the interactions between fat grafts and recipient sites, proposing that recipient-derived adipocytes (fat cells) migrate into grafts and dedifferentiate (change back to a more primitive state) during tissue regeneration.
  • - Researchers used a mouse model to trace fat cells from the recipient that partook in the grafting process, revealing that many of these migrated cells were indeed dedifferentiated and contributed to the fat grafts.
  • - Findings suggest that applying physical expansion to the recipient fat pad boosts the presence of these migrating adipocytes in grafts, potentially leading to improved retention and success of fat grafting, but further research in larger animals is required to validate these results.

Article Abstract

Background: The unstable recipient conditions after fat grafting remain an obstacle for tissue volumization. The interaction between fat grafts and recipient sites is not fully understood. The authors hypothesize that recipient-derived adipocytes undergo dedifferentiation and migrate into fat grafts in tissue regeneration.

Methods: To observe the participation from recipient fat pad, the authors established a recipient adipocyte-tracing model where 0.2 mL of inguinal fat from 10 8-week-old C57BL/6 mice was grafted to 10 tamoxifen-treated AdipoqCre;mT/mG mice. Next, to evaluate the impact of physical force on recipient fat and fat graft, a murine internal expansion model was established by implanting a 1-mL internal expander on the inguinal fat pad of the lineage tracing mice that received fat graft from C57BL/6 mice. Transplanted adipose tissue was collected and analyzed by immunostaining of green fluorescent protein (GFP), tdTomato, perilipin, and CD31.

Results: In the observing model, immunostaining revealed that both GFP+ and tdTomato + cells from the recipient fat pad presented in fat grafts. Among the GFP + cells, most of them were perilipin + adipocytes and other perilipin - cells co-expressed octamer-binding transcription factor 4, indicating dedifferentiated adipocytes. In the internal expansion model, internal expansion increased GFP + cells in fat graft. Both octamer-binding transcription factor 4-positive/GFP + (0.23 ± 0.01 versus 0.12 ± 0.04) and perilipin + /GFP + (0.17 ± 0.02 versus 0.06 ± 0.01) cells were increased in the expanded group, compared with control.

Conclusions: Host-derived adipocytes participate in fat graft regeneration through migration and dedifferentiation, which could be enhanced by internal expansion to increase fat graft retention rate. Further study using a larger animal model is needed, because this is a murine study.

Clinical Relevance Statement: Surgeons are encouraged to use physical expansion preconditioning of the recipient site. Subsequent and multiple fat grafting into the fat layer is encouraged to obtain satisfactory soft-tissue volumization.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011069DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fat graft
20
fat
17
fat grafts
16
internal expansion
16
recipient fat
12
fat pad
12
physical expansion
8
expansion preconditioning
8
fat grafting
8
inguinal fat
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!