AI Article Synopsis

  • The review analyzes the effectiveness of reirradiation (reRT), systemic therapy, and their combination on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), adverse effects (AEs), and quality of life (QoL) in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG).
  • A total of 31 studies involving 2084 participants were assessed, showing that combination therapy generally improves PFS and OS compared to systemic therapy or reRT alone, though evidence certainty was low.
  • The introduction of bevacizumab in combination therapy significantly improves PFS and OS while reducing the risk of radionecrosis, making it a potentially safer option for rHGG patients.

Article Abstract

Purpose: This review compares reirradiation (reRT), systemic therapy and combination therapy (reRT & systemic therapy) with regards to overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), adverse effects (AEs) and quality of life (QoL) in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG).

Methods: A search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase and CENTRAL. Studies reporting OS, PFS, AEs and/or QoL and encompassing the following groups were included; reirradiation vs systemic therapy, combination therapy vs systemic therapy, combination therapy vs reRT, and bevacizumab-based combination therapy vs reRT with/without non-bevacizumab-based systemic therapy. Meta-analyses were performed utilising a random effects model. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE.

Results: Thirty-one studies (three randomised, twenty-eight non-randomised) comprising 2084 participants were included. In the combination therapy vs systemic therapy group, combination therapy improved PFS (HR 0.57 (95% CI 0.41-0.79); low certainty) and OS (HR 0.73 (95% CI 0.56-0.95); low certainty) and there was no difference in grade 3 + AEs (RR 1.03 (95% CI 0.57-1.86); very low certainty). In the combination therapy vs reRT group, combination therapy improved PFS (HR 0.52 (95% CI 0.38-0.72); low certainty) and OS (HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.52-0.93); low certainty). In the bevacizumab-based combination therapy vs reRT with/without non-bevacizumab-based systemic therapy group, adding bevacizumab improved PFS (HR 0.46 (95% CI 0.27-0.77); low certainty) and OS (HR 0.42 (95% CI 0.24-0.72; low certainty) and reduced radionecrosis (RR 0.17 (95% CI 0.06-0.48); low certainty).

Conclusions: Combination therapy may improve OS and PFS with acceptable toxicities in patients with rHGG compared to reRT or systemic therapy alone. Particularly, combining bevacizumab with reRT prophylactically reduces radionecrosis.

Registration: CRD42022291741.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10589175PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11060-023-04441-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

combination therapy
44
systemic therapy
36
low certainty
28
therapy
20
therapy rert
20
rert systemic
12
therapy combination
12
improved pfs
12
combination
11
systemic
9

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!