Aim: The purpose of the study is to compare and evaluate the efficacy of different root canal irrigants-100, 75, 50, and 25% extract, 100, 75, 50, and 25% apple cider vinegar (ACV), a combination of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and saline on smear layer removal using a scanning electron microscope (SEM).
Materials And Methods: A total of 80 freshly extracted single-rooted teeth were collected and divided into 10 groups-group I: normal saline (negative control), group II: NaOCl with EDTA (positive control), group III: 100% extract, group IV: 75% extract, group V: 50% extract, group VI: 25% extract, group VII: 100% ACV, group VIII: 75% ACV, group IX: 50% ACV, and group X: 25% ACV. The samples were irrigated with a specific group of irrigants, then split in a longitudinal axis and processed for analysis in an SEM. Microphotographs were obtained and scored according to Torabinejad et al.
Results: Microphotographs were assessed and showed that 100% extract was similar to NaOCl with EDTA, followed by 75% extract and 100% ACV.
Conclusion: This study showed that 100% extract removed the smear layer, similar to the NaOCl with EDTA.
How To Cite This Article: Sudhakar S, Gupta N, Ghambir N, Comparative Evaluation of Intracanal Smear Layer Removal by Different Root Canal Irrigants: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(4):633-638.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10507302 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2648 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!