Bonitation assessment of intensively used football turf depending on the date and area of observation.

Sci Rep

Department of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Seed Production, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Grunwaldzki 24A, 50-363, Wroclaw, Poland.

Published: September 2023

This article aimed to evaluate the visual and functional characteristics of intensively used football turf over 10 years, depending on the different areas of the game. The research was conducted on the football turf of the AZS Environmental Club in Wrocław (N: 51° 7' 31'' E:17° 4' 14''). High variability of the evaluated parameters was observed regarding seasonality, year of observation, and the area of play. It has been shown that the goal area and penalty box areas have the lowest functional value, which are vital areas of the game from the point of view of gaining an advantage in the game. Also, these places are more susceptible to creating sites without plants (requiring additional overseeding) due to the potential of hollowing and goalkeeper interventions ending with the body landing on the ground. The middle area was characterized by the highest overall aspect, color, and turf density values. In the vast majority of cases, there was a downward trend in the turfs' functional value with the turf's age, which is an essential finding in the context of the use of intensively used, athletic natural grass surfaces.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10511500PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42562-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

football turf
12
intensively football
8
areas game
8
bonitation assessment
4
assessment intensively
4
turf
4
turf depending
4
area
4
depending area
4
area observation
4

Similar Publications

There is growing concern over the safety of artificial turf when it comes to the incidence of player injuries. The artificial surfaces can withstand more play, are cheaper to maintain, and are more predictable. However, there is concern that this beneficial durability comes at the expense of the forgiveness of the surface, leading to more injuries.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to compare injury risks in male Finnish premier division football between natural grass and artificial turf during the 2019 season.
  • A total of 236 players from 12 teams participated, with injury data collected from match reports and player questionnaires over the season.
  • Results showed similar overall injury rates on both surfaces, but forwards might experience a higher injury rate on artificial turf, underscoring that artificial turf doesn't significantly increase overall injury risk compared to natural grass.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is highly recommended in patients with ACL deficiency who must perform at a high physical level. A combination of functional and psychological outcome measures is necessary to provide a comprehensive evaluation of functional status after successful return to sport after ACLR.

Purpose: To identify factors associated with higher functional outcomes among soccer players who had returned to full sports participation after ACLR.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the differences in medical procedures following football injuries on artificial turf compared to natural grass, focusing on imaging and surgical procedures.
  • Researchers analyzed data from 39 universities over 15 seasons (2006-2020) to assess injury rates and types on the two different playing surfaces.
  • Results showed significant differences, with lower incidences of imaging and surgical procedures associated with injuries sustained on artificial turf compared to natural grass.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: It has been argued that the use of artificial turf football fields in the National Football League (NFL) increases player injury risk compared with natural grass surfaces.

Purpose/hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to quantify the rate of lower extremity injuries occurring in NFL players on artificial turf compared with natural grass surfaces and characterize the time missed due to injury and proportion of injuries requiring surgery. It was hypothesized that lower extremity injuries requiring surgical intervention would occur at a higher rate on artificial turf than on natural grass.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!