AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to estimate how often different LI-RADS v2018 categories are reported in CT or MRI exams for screening hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
  • It included 329 patients, with many receiving various types of MRIs and CT scans, finding that 60% had no liver observations and 6% had likely malignant findings.
  • The results can guide the development of screening criteria and evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using CT and MRI for HCC surveillance.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the prevalence of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS, LR) v2018 categories reported on CT or MRI performed for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective study included all reports for CT and MRI exams performed for HCC screening patients between 8/2018 and 4/2020. Patients with ultrasound, CT, or MRI of the abdomen within two years of the index exam were excluded. From each radiology report, we extracted number of reported liver observations, and LI-RADS v2018 category for each observation.

Results: There were 329 patients (170 [52%] male, mean age 59 years [SD 12]), of whom 177 (54%) had MRI with gadoxetate, 72 (22%) had MRI with extracellular contrast, 7 (2%) had MRI with unspecified contrast, and 73 (22%) had CT. Of 329 patients, 199 (60%) had no reported observations; 130 patients had 166 reported observations: 114 (68.7%) LR-1, 8 (4.8%) LR-2, 21 (12.6%) LR-3, 6 (3.6%) LR-4, 13 (7.8%) LR-5, 3 (1.8%) LR-M, and 1 (0.6%) LR-TIV. Of 114 LR-1 observations, 78 (68%) were cysts, 17 (15%) were hemangiomas, 12 (11%) were vascular shunts, 3 (3%) were focal nodular hyperplasia, 2 (2%) were siderotic nodules, 1 (1%) was a lipoma, and 1 (1%) was biliary hamartoma. There were 23 observations with probably or definitely malignant categories (LR-4, LR-5, LR-M or LR- TIV), reported in 20/329 (6%) of patients.

Conclusion: In a cohort of at-risk patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT/MRI for HCC screening, 60% of had no liver observations, and 6 % had probably or definitely malignant observations.

Implications For Patient Care: The prevalence of LI-RADS v2018 categories on CT or MR exams used for HCC screening can help develop screening criteria and assess cost-effectiveness of surveillance strategies with CT and MRI.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-04040-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

li-rads v2018
16
v2018 categories
12
hcc screening
12
prevalence li-rads
8
patients undergoing
8
hepatocellular carcinoma
8
liver observations
8
329 patients
8
reported observations
8
observations definitely
8

Similar Publications

Aim: To investigate the value of the LR-5, which is based on hepatobiliary phase (HBP) hypointensity, for small hepatocellular carcinoma (sHCC) using LI-RADS v2018 criteria.

Materials And Methods: From January 2015 to December 2021 in institution 1, and from January 2019 to February 2022 in institution 2, 239 patients at high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) underwent contrast-enhanced MRI. Two radiologists independently evaluated the imaging features and classified them according to LI-RADS v2018 criteria, calculating the diagnostic performance of LR-5 based on consensus data.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

 The aims of this study are to compare the multiphasic contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) characteristics of infiltrative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with nodular HCC and to assess the conspicuity of infiltrative HCC on different phases of CECT.  This retrospective study comprised consecutive treatment-naive cirrhotic patients diagnosed with infiltrative and nodular HCC between January 2020 and December 2021 based on a multiphasic CECT (comprising arterial, portal venous, and delayed phases). The diagnosis of HCC was based on the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 criteria (LR-4 and LR-5 lesions).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To develop a domain-specific large language model (LLM) for LI-RADS v2018 categorization of hepatic observations based on free-text descriptions extracted from MRI reports.

Material And Methods: This retrospective study included 291 small liver observations, divided into training (n = 141), validation (n = 30), and test (n = 120) datasets. Of these, 120 were fictitious, and 171 were extracted from 175 MRI reports from a single institution.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

New strategy of LI-RADS v2018 to improve the sensitivity for small hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 3.0 cm on extracellular-contrast enhanced MRI.

Eur J Radiol

December 2024

Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, No 600, Tianhe Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China; Organ Transplantation Institute, Sun Yat-sen University; Organ Transplantation Research Center of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Transplantation Medicine, Guangzhou 510630, China; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Liver Disease Research, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China. Electronic address:

Introduction: We aimed to modify LI-RADS version 2018 to improve sensitivity and determine the value of the combination of high alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels for small HCC (sHCC, ≤ 30 mm) diagnosis.

Methods: A total of 984 patients at high risk for HCC, with 1204 observations (including 997 small observations ≤ 30 mm), who underwent extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI were enrolled from five independent centers. Blinded readers evaluated the LI-RADS features and categorized each observation according to the LI-RADS v2018, modified LI-RADS and EASL.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aims to evaluate how well LI-RADS (Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System) diagnoses liver cancer in patients with non-cirrhotic HCV infection, analyzing data from 66 observations involving adult patients.
  • Results show that while LI-RADS categories like LR-1 and LR-2 had no predictive value, LR-5 demonstrated high sensitivity (74-90%) and specificity (94-100%) for hepatic cellular carcinoma (HCC), making it a reliable indicator.
  • The inter-reader agreement among radiologists was substantial for final assessments, suggesting that LI-RADS can be effectively used for diagnosing malignancies in this patient group with excellent specificity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!