AI Article Synopsis

  • Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a useful tool for detecting hidden heart problems in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), but its relationship with ischemia in those with myocardial ischemia and no obstructive CAD (INOCA) is less understood.
  • A study analyzed GLS in patients with INOCA using stress echocardiography, revealing that the majority had normal GLS values both at enrollment and after one year, but these values did not correlate with stress-induced ischemia.
  • The findings suggest that in INOCA patients, normal GLS does not indicate the presence or severity of ischemia, indicating a need for alternative assessment methods for myocardial dysfunction in this group.

Article Abstract

Background: Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a sensitive marker for identifying subclinical myocardial dysfunction in obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Little is known about the relationship between GLS and ischemia in patients with myocardial ischemia and no obstructive CAD (INOCA).

Objectives: To investigate the relationship between resting GLS and ischemia on stress echocardiography (SE) in patients with INOCA.

Methods: Left ventricular GLS was calculated offline on resting SE images at enrollment (n = 144) and 1-year follow-up (n = 120) in the CIAO-ISCHEMIA (Changes in Ischemia and Angina over One year in International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches trial screen failures with no obstructive CAD on computed tomography [CT] angiography) study, which enrolled participants with moderate or severe ischemia by local SE interpretation (≥3 segments with new or worsening wall motion abnormality and no obstructive (<50% stenosis) on coronary computed tomography angiography.

Results: Global longitudinal strain values were normal in 83.3% at enrollment and 94.2% at follow-up. Global longitudinal strain values were not associated with a positive SE at enrollment (GLS = -21.5% positive SE vs GLS = -19.9% negative SE, P = .443) or follow-up (GLS = -23.2% positive SE vs GLS = -23.1% negative SE, P = .859). Significant change in GLS was not associated with positive SE in follow-up (P = .401). Regional strain was not associated with colocalizing ischemia at enrollment or follow-up. Changes in GLS and number of ischemic segments from enrollment to follow-up showed a modest but not clinically meaningful correlation (β = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.16, 0.67; P = .002).

Conclusions: In this cohort of INOCA patients, resting GLS values were largely normal and did not associate with the presence, severity, or location of stress-induced ischemia. These findings may suggest the absence of subclinical myocardial dysfunction detectable by echocardiographic strain analysis at rest in INOCA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10842002PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2023.09.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

global longitudinal
8
longitudinal strain
8
ischemia obstructive
8
obstructive coronary
8
coronary artery
8
artery disease
8
gls ischemia
8
obstructive cad
8
ischemia
6
obstructive
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!