A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Cone beam computed tomography image guidance within a magnetic resonance imaging-only planning workflow. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • MRI-only planning workflows have benefits but face image guidance challenges; this study explored using MRI for guiding treatment with Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT).
  • Ten radiation therapists were trained and assessed on their ability to match MRI with CBCT across various anatomical regions, using data from multiple patients.
  • Results showed minimal differences in matching accuracy based on therapists' experience, indicating that focused training can effectively integrate MRI to CBCT guidance in clinical practice.

Article Abstract

Background And Purpose: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-only planning workflows offer many advantages but raises challenges regarding image guidance. The study aimed to assess the viability of MRI to Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) based image guidance for MRI-only planning treatment workflows.

Materials And Methods: An MRI matching training package was developed. Ten radiation therapists, with a range of clinical image guidance experience and experience with MRI, completed the training package prior to matching assessment. The matching assessment was performed on four match regions: prostate gold seed, prostate soft tissue, rectum/anal canal and gynaecological. Each match region consisted of five patients, with three CBCTs per patient, resulting in fifteen CBCTs for each match region. The ten radiation therapists performed the CBCT image matching to CT and to MRI for all regions and recorded the match values.

Results: The median inter-observer variation for MRI-CBCT matching and CT-CBCT matching for all regions were within 2 mm and 1 degree. There was no statistically significant association in the inter-observer variation in mean match values and radiation therapist image guidance experience levels. There was no statistically significant association in inter-observer variation in mean match values for MRI experience levels for prostate soft tissue and gynaecological match regions, while there was a statistically significant difference for prostate gold seed and rectum match regions.

Conclusion: The results of this study support the concept that with focussed training, an MRI to CBCT image guidance approach can be successfully implemented in a clinical planning workflow.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500022PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100472DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

image guidance
24
inter-observer variation
12
cone beam
8
beam computed
8
computed tomography
8
magnetic resonance
8
planning workflow
8
mri-only planning
8
training package
8
ten radiation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!