Objectives: To critically appraise the quality of the studies underpinning the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2017 estimates for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) with respect to i) the GBD 2017 inclusion criteria and ii) population coverage.

Design: Systematic critical appraisal.

Setting: Not applicable.

Participants: Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures: Each study was critically appraised with respect to the four GBD 2017 inclusion criteria: representativeness, study method and sample, diagnostic criteria and publication from 1980 onwards. Population coverage was calculated.

Results: Less than half of studies (221/467, 47.3%) were nationally representative. Only 262/467 (56.1%) of studies reported specifically on MDD and more than a third did not use DSM or ICD diagnostic criteria: 94/467 (20.1%) did not specify any diagnostic criteria and 68/467 (14.6%) relied on self-reported depression for diagnosis. Only 62/467 (13.3%) of studies were conducted during the period 2011-2017. Only 107/195 (54.9%) of countries had one or more prevalence studies.

Conclusions: GBD 2017 estimates for MDD are based on incomplete country and population coverage. The inclusion of studies with non-representative populations, that do not use diagnostic criteria and the lack of specific data on MDD reduces the reliability of estimates and limits their value for policy making.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501079PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20542704231197594DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gbd 2017
16
diagnostic criteria
16
2017 estimates
12
global burden
8
burden disease
8
estimates major
8
major depressive
8
depressive disorder
8
respect gbd
8
2017 inclusion
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!