Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
This study compared the effect of the conventional technique of procedural sedation and the mini-dose intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA). 45 patients received IVRA, and 47 received iv. ketamine. The pain score, emergency department (ED) length of stay and patients' satisfaction were compared. The study revealed that not only the levels of hemodynamic parameters but also their stability, and the patient's satisfaction in the IVRA group were significantly better. The patients' pain score and ED length of stay were also significantly decreased in those who received IVRA. Mini-dose IVRA technique contributes to better hemodynamic stability, without prominent adverse events, and leads to significant pain control and improved ED throughput time. : NCT03349216 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/pmt-2023-0030 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!