Optimizing Safety and Success: The Advantages of Bloodless Cardiac Surgery. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes in Jehovah's Witnesses.

Transfusions are extremely frequent after cardiac surgery, and they have a considerable economic burden and impact on outcomes. Optimal patient blood management could play a fundamental role in reducing the rate of transfusion and Jehovah's Witnesses (JW) represent the ideal surrogate study population. This meta-analysis compares outcomes of JWs and non-JWs' patients undergoing cardiac surgery, assessing the safety of a bloodless cardiac surgery. A scoping review was conducted using a search strategy for studies assessing outcomes of JW undergoing cardiac surgery. The primary outcome was perioperative mortality, and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Ten studies were included in our meta-analysis, involving 780 JW patients refusing any type of transfusion ("JW") and 1182 patients accepting transfusion if needed ("non-JW"). 86% of non-JW patients received at least 1 transfusion. There was no significant difference in terms of perioperative mortality (OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.55-1.52; p = 0.72). The volume blood loss was significantly less in the JW (p = 0.001), while the rate of reoperation for bleeding was also lower, but not statistically significative, in the JW (p = 0.16). Both preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin and hematocrit were significantly higher in the JW. Therefore, we concluded that bloodless cardiac surgery is safe and early outcomes are similar between JW and non-JW patients: optimal patient blood management is fundamental in guarantying these results. Further studies are needed to assess if a limitation of transfusion could have a positive long-term impact on outcomes.