The prognostic significance of histologic variant on survival outcomes in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy.

BMC Cancer

Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, No.123, Dapi Rd., Niaosong Dist, Kaohsiung City, 833, Taiwan.

Published: September 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • Patients with variant-type urothelial carcinoma (vUC) have limited effective treatment options compared to those with pure urothelial carcinoma (pUC), and the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in vUC is still uncertain.
  • A study involving 142 patients found that the overall response rate (ORR) to ICI was higher in pUC (34.5%) compared to vUC (23.1%), with no complete responses seen in vUC cases.
  • Despite similarities in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between both groups, patients with pUC who received ICI as first-line treatment had significantly better OS compared to vUC patients, indicating ICI may be a viable

Article Abstract

Background: While the treatment guidelines have been established for pure urothelial carcinoma (pUC), patients with variant type urothelial carcinoma (vUC) face limited effective treatment options. The effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with vUC remains uncertain and necessitates additional research.

Method: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study to explore the effectiveness of ICI in patients with pUC or vUC in Taiwan. We evaluated the overall response rate (ORR) through univariate logistic regression analysis and examined the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Additionally, we employed univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to analyze the data.

Result: A total of 142 patients (116 pUC, 26 vUC) were included in our final analysis. The ORR was marginally higher in patients with pUC compared to those with vUC (34.5% vs. 23.1%, p = 0.26). Among all patients, 12.9% with pUC achieved a complete response (CR) after ICI treatment, while no vUC cases achieved CR (p = 0.05). There were no significant differences in PFS (median 3.6 months vs. 4.1 months, p = 0.34) or OS (median 16.3 months vs. 11.0 months, p = 0.24) when comparing patients with pUC or vUC. In the subgroup analysis, patients with pUC who underwent first-line ICI treatment exhibited significantly improved OS compared to those with vUC (24.6 months vs. 9.1 months, p = 0.004).

Conclusion: The use of ICI as monotherapy is a feasible and effective treatment approach for patients with metastatic vUC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10504763PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11398-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients puc
16
urothelial carcinoma
12
puc vuc
12
patients
10
vuc
9
patients metastatic
8
immune checkpoint
8
effective treatment
8
ici patients
8
compared vuc
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!