Electronic Health Records (EHRs) Can Identify Patients at High Risk of Fracture but Require Substantial Race Adjustments to Currently Available Fracture Risk Calculators.

J Gen Intern Med

Department of Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Ave, MC 1027, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.

Published: December 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • Osteoporotic fracture prediction calculators are underutilized in primary care, but automating predictions using electronic health records (EHR) could improve their use, particularly in diverse populations.
  • A study analyzed EHR data from over 24,000 patients in Philadelphia, examining the effectiveness of two popular fracture prediction tools (FRAX and QFracture) across different racial and ethnic groups, finding similar accuracy in predicting fractures.
  • The findings highlighted that while FRAX showed better calibration and generally accurate adjustments for Black women, it underestimated risks for Black men and Hispanic patients, pointing to a need for improved predictive accuracy in these groups.

Article Abstract

Background: Osteoporotic fracture prediction calculators are poorly utilized in primary care, leading to underdiagnosis and undertreatment of those at risk for fracture. The use of these calculators could be improved if predictions were automated using the electronic health record (EHR). However, this approach is not well validated in multi-ethnic populations, and it is not clear if the adjustments for race or ethnicity made by calculators are appropriate.

Objective: To investigate EHR-generated fracture predictions in a multi-ethnic population.

Design: Retrospective cohort study using data from the EHR.

Setting: An urban, academic medical center in Philadelphia, PA.

Participants: 12,758 White, 7,844 Black, and 3,587 Hispanic patients seeking routine care from 2010 to 2018 with mean 3.8 years follow-up.

Interventions: None.

Measurements: FRAX and QFracture, two of the most used fracture prediction tools, were studied. Risk for major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture were calculated using data from the EHR at baseline and compared to the number of fractures that occurred during follow-up.

Results: MOF rates varied from 3.2 per 1000 patient-years in Black men to 7.6 in White women. FRAX and QFracture had similar discrimination for MOF prediction (area under the curve, AUC, 0.69 vs. 0.70, p=0.08) and for hip fracture prediction (AUC 0.77 vs 0.79, p=0.21) and were similar by race or ethnicity. FRAX had superior calibration than QFracture (calibration-in-the-large for FRAX 0.97 versus QFracture 2.02). The adjustment factors used in MOF prediction were generally accurate in Black women, but underestimated risk in Black men, Hispanic women, and Hispanic men.

Limitations: Single center design.

Conclusions: Fracture predictions using only EHR inputs can discriminate between high and low risk patients, even in Black and Hispanic patients, and could help primary care physicians identify patients who need screening or treatment. However, further refinements to the calculators may better adjust for race-ethnicity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10713897PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08347-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fracture prediction
12
fracture
10
electronic health
8
identify patients
8
risk fracture
8
osteoporotic fracture
8
primary care
8
race ethnicity
8
fracture predictions
8
hispanic patients
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!