Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objectives: To establish a machine learning model to predict functional outcomes after SCI with Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) using features present at the time of rehabilitation admission.
Study Design: A retrospective, single-center study. The following data were collected from the medical charts: age, sex, acute length of stay (LOS), level of injury, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS), motor scores of each key muscle, Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS), Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS), SCIM total scores, and subtotal scores on admission and discharge. Based on the multivariate linear regression analysis, age, acute LOS, UEMS, LEMS, and SCIM subtotal scores were selected as features for machine learning algorithms. Random forest, support vector machine, neural network, and gradient boosting were used as the base models and combined using ridge regression as a metamodel.
Setting: A spinal center in Tokyo, Japan.
Participants: Participants were individuals with SCI admitted to our hospital from March 2016 to October 2021 for the first rehabilitation after the injury. They were divided into 2 groups: training (n=140) and testing (n=70).
Interventions: Not applicable.
Main Outcome Measures: The root-mean-square error (RMSE), R, and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) were used as accuracy measures.
Results: RMSE, R, and MAE of the meta-model using the testing group were 9.7453, 0.8835, and 7.4743, respectively, outperforming any other single base model.
Conclusions: Our study revealed that functional prognostication could be achieved using machine-learning methods with features present at the time of rehabilitation admission. Goals can be set at the beginning of rehabilitation. Moreover, our model can be used to evaluate advanced medical treatments, such as regenerative medicine.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2023.08.011 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!