AI Article Synopsis

  • Timely HIV diagnosis in infants in Malawi is crucial due to high exposure rates, with traditional PCR tests causing delays of 2-3 months due to centralized lab requirements.
  • The study assessed the cost-effectiveness of the point-of-care testing (XpertHIV) against standard PCR testing, finding that XpertHIV was cheaper per test and provided significantly faster results.
  • Using XpertHIV could yield substantial annual savings of over $2 million if implemented nationwide, highlighting its potential benefits for more efficient and accessible HIV testing.

Article Abstract

Background: Timely diagnosis of HIV in infants and children is an urgent priority. In Malawi, 40,000 infants annually are HIV exposed. However, gold standard polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) based testing requires centralised laboratories, causing turn-around times (TAT) of 2 to 3 months and significant loss to follow-up. If feasible and acceptable, minimising diagnostic delays through HIV Point-of-care-testing (POCT) may be cost-effective. We assessed whether POCT Cepheid Xpert HIV-1 Qual assay whole blood (XpertHIV) was more cost-effective than PCR.

Methods: From July-August 2018, 700 PCR Abbott tests using dried blood spots (DBS) were performed on 680 participants who enrolled on the feasibility, acceptability and performance of the XpertHIV study. Newly identified HIV-positive We conducted a cost-minimisation and cost-effectiveness analysis of XpertHIV against PCR, as the standard of care. A random sample of 200 caregivers from the 680 participants had semi-structured interviews to explore costs from a societal perspective of XpertHIV at Mulanje District Hospital, Malawi. Analysis used TAT as the primary outcome measure. Results were extrapolated from the study period (29 days) to a year (240 working days). Sensitivity analyses characterised individual and joint parameter uncertainty and estimated patient cost per test.

Results: During the study period, XpertHIV was cost-minimising at $42.34 per test compared to $66.66 for PCR. Over a year, XpertHIV remained cost-minimising at $16.12 compared to PCR at $27.06. From the patient perspective (travel, food, lost productivity), the cost per test of XpertHIV was $2.45. XpertHIV had a mean TAT of 7.10 hours compared to 153.15 hours for PCR. Extrapolates accounting for equipment costs, lab consumables and losses to follow up estimated annual savings of $2,193,538.88 if XpertHIV is used nationally, as opposed to PCR.

Conclusions: This preliminary evidence suggests that adopting POCT XpertHIV will save time, allowing HIV-exposed infants to receive prompt care and may improve outcomes. The Malawi government will pay less due to XpertHIV's cost savings and associated benefits.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501532PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.52872/001c.37787DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

xperthiv
10
cepheid xpert
8
qual assay
8
assay blood
8
pcr abbott
8
680 participants
8
study period
8
pcr
7
costing cost-effectiveness
4
cost-effectiveness cepheid
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!