TMS must not harm participants: guidelines for evaluating TMS protocol safety.

Cogn Neurosci

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, USA.

Published: September 2023

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can modulate a targeted brain region to assess whether that region is involved in a cognitive process. When TMS is employed in cognitive neuroscience, participants are typically healthy volunteers, and the technique is described as noninvasive. However, TMS parameters can be set such that stimulation produces long-lasting effects. Critically, TMS effects that have any possibility of lasting beyond a participant's time in the lab are potentially harmful. In this editorial, evidence is considered that indicates a 20-Hz multi-day TMS protocol has long-lasting effects, and a continuous theta-burst stimulation protocol needs further testing before it is deemed noninvasive. The following guidelines are provided for TMS protocol evaluation: 1) Effects must be shown to completely dissipate before participants leave the lab by testing well beyond the expected duration. 2) Participants should complete a cognitive test battery before TMS and after the effects are expected to dissipate. 3) Protocols should not be employed that produce effects lasting longer than the time in the lab. 4) The number of participants should ensure error bars are small, and results generalize to the population. 5) Results should be assessed at the group and individual-participant level, and effects should dissipate for every participant. 6) Bayesian analysis should be conducted to evaluate evidence in favor of the null hypothesis. 7) Effects should be assessed in multiple cortical regions. It is hoped that these guidelines will be employed to ensure the continued use of TMS as a valuable tool in the field of cognitive neuroscience.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2023.2259553DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tms protocol
12
tms
10
cognitive neuroscience
8
effects
8
long-lasting effects
8
tms effects
8
time lab
8
participants
5
tms harm
4
harm participants
4

Similar Publications

Real-Time Tractography-Assisted Neuronavigation for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Hum Brain Mapp

January 2025

Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.

State-of-the-art navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) systems can display the TMS coil position relative to the structural magnetic resonance image (MRI) of the subject's brain and calculate the induced electric field. However, the local effect of TMS propagates via the white-matter network to different areas of the brain, and currently there is no commercial or research neuronavigation system that can highlight in real time the brain's structural connections during TMS. This lack of real-time visualization may overlook critical inter-individual differences in brain connectivity and does not provide the opportunity to target brain networks.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Identification of therapeutic targets in the treatment of adolescent depression with attenuated symptoms of schizophrenia and assessment of the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions.

Material And Methods: One hundred and twenty-three patients (mean age 19.6±2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A novel variant of paired-associative stimulation (PAS) consisting of high-frequency peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and high-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) above the motor cortex, called high-PAS, can lead to improved motor function in patients with incomplete spinal cord injury. In PAS, the interstimulus interval (ISI) between the PNS and TMS pulses plays a significant role in the location of the intended effect of the induced plastic changes. While conventional PAS protocols (single TMS pulse often applied with intensity close to resting motor threshold, and single PNS pulse) usually require precisely defined ISIs, high-PAS can induce plasticity at a wide range of ISIs and also in spite of small ISI errors, which is helpful in clinical settings where precise ISI determination can be challenging.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Effectiveness of sequential bilateral repetitive transcranial stimulation versus bilateral theta burst stimulation for patients with treatment-resistant depression (BEAT-D): A randomized non-inferiority clinical trial.

Brain Stimul

December 2024

Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan; Shinjuku-Yoyogi Mental Lab Clinic, 5-27-5 Sendagaya, Shibuyaku, Tokyo, 151-0051, Japan; Department of Psychiatry, International University of Health and Welfare, Mita Hospital, 1-4-3 Mita, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8329, Japan. Electronic address:

Background: Bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (BL-rTMS) over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is effective for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Owing to a shorter treatment time, bilateral theta burst stimulation (BL-TBS) can be more efficient protocol. The non-inferiority of BL-TBS to BL-rTMS was established in late-life TRD; however, this has not been determined in adults of other age groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a promising intervention for adolescents with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). However, the durability of TMS-related improvement in adolescents is unclear. This 6-month study followed adolescents with TRD who had responded to TMS and provided TMS retreatment for adolescents with a partial relapse.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!