Background: The sealing ability of different liners under composite restorations in the reduction of microleakage.
Aim: To evaluate the effects of three different liners in sandwich techniques on gingival microleakage of class II composite restorations.
Materials And Methods: Standardized Class II box cavities were prepared on forty premolar teeth and randomly divided into four groups, = 10: Group A, no liner (control); Group B, Polofil NHT Flow; Group C, Ionolux; and Group D, Fuji VII. The etching, bonding, and process for restoring the whole remaining mass of the cavities with G-aenial composite were the same, with the sandwich material expectations. Dye penetration was evaluated using a stereomicroscope.
Statistical Analysis: Duncan's analysis and Friedman's test.
Results: Group A showed the highest microleakage followed by Group D, Group C, and Group B.
Conclusion: Polofil NHT Flow seems to be a promising liner for gingivally deep class II cavities.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10497087 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_73_23 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!