Background: CYFRA 21 - 1 is a useful marker for diagnosing and monitoring lung cancer. However, its stability remains unclear. Moreover, while its applicability to screening is now being investigated, CYFRA 21 - 1 levels in individuals without cancer, who are targets for cancer screening, have not yet been the focus of research. Therefore, the present study investigated variability in and the factors increasing serum CYFRA 21 - 1 levels.
Methods: This retrospective study recruited 951 individuals undergoing annual medical examinations for six years. We used data obtained in the first four years. Variability in serum CYFRA 21 - 1 levels over a period of four years were investigated. CYFRA 21 - 1 was categorized as normal (≤ 3.5 ng/ml) or elevated (> 3.5 ng/ml). The rate of an elevated level in one visit and the transition from an elevated to normal level between visits were visualized. A multiple logistic regression model was used to study the relationships between the frequency of elevated CYFRA 21 - 1 levels and clinical characteristics, such as age, sex, body mass index, weight changes, and the smoking status.
Results: Approximately 5% of subjects had elevated CYFRA 21 - 1 levels once in five tests over four years, while 15% had elevated CYFRA 21 - 1 levels once or more. Among subjects with elevated CYFRA 21 - 1 levels in one blood test, between 63 and 72% had normal levels in the next test. The median CYFRA 21 - 1 level in subjects with elevations in one blood test significantly decreased in the next test at all four time points. The frequency of elevated CYFRA 21 - 1 levels was associated with an older age [odds ratio (OR) = 6.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.01-16.2], current heavy smoking (OR = 3.46, 95% CI = 1.52-7.9), and weight loss (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.07-3.24).
Conclusions: Variability in and the factors increasing serum CYFRA 21 - 1 levels beyond the cut-off value need to be considered when interpretating CYFRA 21 - 1 test results. The future application of CYFRA 21 - 1 to lung cancer screening may require more than a single measurement.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10500899 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-023-02650-x | DOI Listing |
Biosensors (Basel)
December 2024
Prokhorov General Physics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 38 Vavilov Street, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
A novel approach to developing lateral flow assays (LFAs) for the detection of CYFRA 21-1 (cytokeratin 19 fragment, a molecular biomarker for epithelial-origin cancers) is proposed. Magnetic bioconjugates (MBCs) were employed in combination with advanced optical and magnetic tools to optimize assay conditions. The approach integrates such techniques as label-free spectral-phase interferometry, colorimetric detection, and ultrasensitive magnetometry using the magnetic particle quantification (MPQ) technique.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancers (Basel)
November 2024
Precision Medicine Lung Cancer Center, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea.
: Lung nodules detected by chest computed tomography (CT) often require invasive biopsies for definitive diagnosis, leading to unnecessary procedures for benign lesions. A blood-based biomarker test that predicts lung cancer risk in CT-detected nodules could help stratify patients and direct invasive diagnostics toward high-risk individuals. : In this multicenter, single-blinded clinical trial, we evaluated a test measuring plasma levels of p53, anti-p53 autoantibodies, CYFRA 21-1, and anti-CYFRA 21-1 autoantibodies in patients with CT-detected lung nodules.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
October 2024
Microbiology, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, BGD.
iScience
November 2024
Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, P.R. China.
We employed a three-step approach to evaluate serum immunoassay-based biomarkers for detecting non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the first step, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis and implemented the Laboratory Medicine Best Practices (LMBP) method to identify potential biomarkers. From potential biomarkers, Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19-fragments (Cyfra 21-1), and human epididymis protein-4 (HE4) were categorized as LMBP "recommend.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancers (Basel)
November 2024
Department of Thoracic Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!