Immune responses of six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate 4 functions as a novel biomarker in gastric cancer.

Background: Immune cells play an important role in regulating the behavior of tumor cells. According to emerging evidence, six-transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate 4 (STEAP4) performs a crucial part in tumor microenvironmental immune response and tumorigenesis, and serves as the potential target for cellular and antibody immunotherapy. However, the immunotherapeutic role of STEAP4 in gastric cancer (GC) remains unclear.

Aim: To investigate the expression of STEAP4 in GC and its relationship with immune infiltrating cells, and explore the potential value of STEAP4 as an immune prognostic indicator in GC.

Methods: The expression level of STEAP4 was characterized by immunohistochemistry in tumors and adjacent non-cancerous samples in 96 GC patients. Tumor Immune Estimation Resource was used to study the correlation between STEAP4 and tumor immune infiltration level and immune infiltration gene signature. R package was used to analyze the relationship between STEAP4 expression and immune and stromal scores in GC (GSE62254) by the ESTIMATE algorithm, and Kaplan-Meier Plotter and Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis were applied to analyze the effect of STEAP4 on clinical prognosis.

Results: Immunohistochemistry analysis showed that STEAP4 expression was higher in GC tissues than in adjacent tissues, and STEAP4 expression was positively correlated with the clinical stage of GC. In GC, the expression of STEAP4 was positively correlated with the infiltration levels of B cells, CD4+ T cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells. The expression level of STEAP4 was strongly correlated with most of the immune markers. In addition, STEAP4 expression was inversely correlated with tumor purity, but correlated with stromal score ( = 0.43, < 0.001), immune score ( = 0.29, < 0.001) and estimate score ( = 0.39, < 0.001). Moreover, stromal, immune, and estimate scores were higher in the STEAP4 high expression group, whereas tumor purity was higher in the STEAP4 Low expression group. The relationship between STEAP4 expression and prognosis of patients with GC was further investigated, and the results showed that high STEAP4 expression was associated with poor overall survival and disease-free survival. In addition, Kaplan-Meier Plotter showed that high expression of STEAP4 was significantly correlated with poor survival of patients with GC.

Conclusion: The current findings suggest an oncogenic role for STEAP4 in GC, with significantly high levels being associated with poor prognosis. Investigation of the GC tumor microenvironment suggests the potential function of STEAP4 is connected with the infiltration of diverse immune cells, which may contribute to the regulation of the tumor microenvironment. In conclusion, STEAP4 may serve as a potential therapeutic target for GC to improve the immune infiltration, as well as serve as a prognostic biomarker for judging the prognosis and immune infiltration status of GC.