Pancreaticoduodenectomy is the procedure of choice for benign or malignant tumors of the periampullary region. The preservation of the pylorus has been established as the mostly utilized approach during pancreaticoduodenectomy among the majority of specialized, in the surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer, centers worldwide. The factors that influenced this predilection are the shorter operation times, the less intraoperative blood loss, the decreased technical difficulty, and the quite similar short- and long-term outcomes compared to the classic Whipple. However, there is a notable trend in the literature highlighting the increased incidence of delayed gastric emptying following pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Among other factors, pylorus dysfunction attributable to the surgical maneuvers has been implemented in the etiology of this complication. In an attempt to overcome this limitation of the pylorus preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy, pylorus resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy with the preservation of the stomach was proposed. In theory, pylorus resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy could maintain the advantages of organ sparing surgery, but at the same time guarantee a more seamless gastric emptying. Only three RCTs, to date, aimed to evaluate the approach with only one reporting results in favor of the pylorus resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy in regard to the incidence of delayed gastric emptying. Further well-designed prospective randomized studies are needed for an accurate assessment of the true role of each of these surgical alternatives on the treatment of pancreatic cancer.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.2023.v.118.i.4.p.335 | DOI Listing |
Background: There is controversy regarding which is the best reconstruction technique after the pancreatoduodenectomy. Currently, there are no studies comparing the three most frequent reconstruction techniques: Whipple + Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy (WRYGJ), pyloric-preserving + Billroth II (PPBII), and Whipple + BII (WBII).
Methods: Between 2012 and March 2023, 246 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with the following type of reconstruction techniques: (1) WRYGJ: 40 patients; (2) PPBII: 118 patients; and (3) WBII: 88 patients.
Cureus
December 2024
Department of Surgery, Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, JPN.
Ectopic varices can result from portal vein stenosis following pancreaticoduodenectomy with concomitant portal vein resection reconstruction, and they can cause gastrointestinal bleeding. Although they can sometimes be fatal, various treatments have been reported. This report describes a case in which a percutaneous transhepatic approach was used to simultaneously perform variceal embolization and portal vein stenting in which a favorable outcome was achieved.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHPB (Oxford)
December 2024
Department of GI Surgery & Liver Transplantation, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Objective: To compare pylorus resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy (PRPD) with classical pancreaticoduodenectomy (classical PD) in terms of short term outcomes.
Background: There is some evidence that Pylorus resecting PD (PRPD) is associated with lesser incidence of DGE when compared to pylorus preserving PD (PPPD). However, no study has previously compared PRPD with classical PD.
Ann Vasc Dis
December 2024
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Hachinohe City Hospital, Hachinohe, Aomori, Japan.
A superior mesenteric arteriovenous fistula (SMAVF) following gastrointestinal surgery represents a rare vascular complication. Enhanced computed tomography with 3-dimensional reconstruction proves to be the most efficacious modality for detecting this uncommon entity. Superior mesenteric angiography becomes imperative to accurately delineate the location and extent of mesenteric vessel involvement, which is essential for devising an optimal treatment strategy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLangenbecks Arch Surg
December 2024
Division of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007, Shimo-Nagakubo, Sunoto-Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
Background: This study compared short- and mid-term outcomes of hemihepatectomy (HH) and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, focusing on surgical outcomes, body composition, and nutritional status.
Method: A retrospective review was conducted to assess short-term outcomes, including operative time, blood loss, complications, and mortality. Body composition and nutritional parameters were analyzed preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!