Measures of treatment burden in dialysis: A scoping review.

J Ren Care

School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, UK.

Published: September 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • Dialysis is a crucial but challenging treatment for kidney failure, and there are limited tools to evaluate the burden it imposes on patients.
  • The study conducted a review of existing measures for assessing treatment burden in chronic kidney disease to see if they fit the needs of dialysis patients.
  • Findings showed 102 measures identified, but none effectively covered all aspects of treatment burden, highlighting the need for better tools that also address health inequalities.

Article Abstract

Background: Dialysis is a life-sustaining treatment for patients with advanced kidney failure, but it is extremely burdensome. Despite this, there are very few tools available to assess treatment burden within the dialysis population.

Objective: To conduct a scoping review of generic and disease-specific measures of treatment burden in chronic kidney disease, and assess their suitability for use within the dialysis population.

Design: We searched CINAHL, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library for kidney disease-specific measures of treatment burden. Studies were initially included if they described the development, validation or use of a treatment burden measure or associated concept (e.g., measures of treatment satisfaction, quality of life, illness intrusiveness, disease burden etc.) in adult patients with chronic kidney disease. We also updated a previous scoping review exploring measures of treatment burden in chronic disease to identify generic treatment burden measures.

Results: One-hundred and two measures of treatment burden or associated concepts were identified. Four direct measures and two indirect measures of treatment burden were assessed, using adapted established criteria, for suitability for use within the dialysis population. The researchers outlined eight key dimensions of treatment burden: medication, financial, administrative, lifestyle, health care, time/travel, dialysis-specific factors, and health inequality. None of the measures adequately assessed all dimensions of treatment burden.

Conclusion: Current measures of treatment burden in dialysis are inadequate to capture the spectrum of issues that matter to patients. There is a need for dialysis-specific burdens and health inequality to be assessed when exploring treatment burden to advance patient care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jorc.12480DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

treatment burden
48
measures treatment
32
treatment
14
burden
13
burden dialysis
12
scoping review
12
measures
10
disease-specific measures
8
burden chronic
8
chronic kidney
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!