Background: Paracetamol is widely used for low back pain (LBP), but research questions its efficacy and safety. Patient education booklets have been explored for promoting deprescribing, but barriers and facilitators specific to LBP deprescribing remain unexamined.
Objective: To identify contextual factors facilitating and obstructing successful deprescribing of paracetamol for LBP after receiving an educational booklet.
Study Design: This study is part of an uncontrolled cohort feasibility study (CEASE NOW) in the community, recruiting from Musculoskeletal Australia and painaustralia.
Patient Sample: Twenty-four participants with acute, sub-acute, or chronic LBP, self-reporting paracetamol consumption, were included.
Methods: Thematic content analysis was used to analyze qualitative data on barriers and facilitators. Data were categorized by deprescribing outcomes: i) successful deprescribing, ii) attempted but failed, or iii) no attempt. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted within one week after each participant completed the one-month follow-up.
Results: Successful deprescribing was facilitated by supportive healthcare professionals, willingness, high self-efficacy, fear of future illness, and diverse strategies for deprescribing plans. Barriers included unsupportive healthcare professionals and fear of flare-ups. Participants not attempting deprescribing believed it unnecessary, perceived it as effortful, unquestioningly trusted healthcare professionals, and lacked risk awareness.
Conclusions: Support from healthcare professionals, patient willingness, perceived necessity, risk awareness, effort, and varied strategies influence deprescribing outcomes for LBP patients using paracetamol. Addressing these factors is crucial when designing interventions to promote safe and effective deprescribing in LBP management.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102856 | DOI Listing |
Cancer Nurs
January 2025
Author Affiliations: Department Research, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona; and NURECARE Research Group, Institut d'Investigació i Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol (IGTP), Ctra de Can Ruti, Camí de les Escoles (Dr Huertas-Zurriaga); Department Research, Institut Català Oncologia-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol; Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona; GRIN Group, IDIBELL, Institute of Biomedical Research; and NURECARE Research Group, IGTP, Ctra de Can Ruti, Camí de les Escoles (Dr Cabrera-Jaime); Tecnocampus University and NURECARE Research Group, IGTP, Ctra de Can Ruti, Camí de les Escoles (Dr Navarri); Oncology Department, Hereditarian Cancer Program, Institut Català Oncologia-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, B-ARGO (Badalona Applied Research Group in Oncology), IGTP (Health Research Institute Germans Trias i Pujol), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (Dr Teruel-Garcia); and Nursing Research Group in Vulnerability and Health (GRIVIS); and Nursing Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (Dr Leyva-Moral), Badalona, Spain.
Background: Breast cancer survivors face unique challenges in breastfeeding decisions. Limited research exists on the experiences and decision-making processes of young women with breast cancer regarding breastfeeding.
Objective: To explain the decision-making processes of young women with breast cancer in relation to breastfeeding throughout the cancer trajectory.
Ophthalmol Ther
January 2025
International Health Policy Program (IHPP), Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Introduction: Screening diabetic retinopathy (DR) for timely management can reduce global blindness. Many existing DR screening programs worldwide are non-digital, standalone, and deployed with grading retinal photographs by trained personnel. To integrate the screening programs, with or without artificial intelligence (AI), into hospital information systems to improve their effectiveness, the non-digital workflow must be transformed into digital.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTher Innov Regul Sci
January 2025
Bayer US LLC, Whippany, NJ, USA.
Background: Clinical outcome assessments (COAs) measure how patients feel or function and can be used to understand which patients experience benefits of treatment and which do not. Interpretation of COA data is influenced by how meaningful change is defined. We aimed to compare how different stakeholders define, assess, and use meaningful change for decisions that impact patients.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Acquir Immune Defic Syndr
February 2025
Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Bureau of Infectious Disease and Laboratory Sciences, Boston, MA.
Background: Most young adults with perinatal HIV (PHIV) transition from pediatric or adolescent to adult clinical care. Although guidelines to increase transition success have been recommended, we know little about uptake of these guidelines, particularly by adult care clinics.
Methods: We administered web-based surveys to adult care providers of young adults with PHIV in Massachusetts to evaluate transition preparation and post-transition evaluation practices.
J Prim Care Community Health
January 2025
University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Community Health Workers (CHWs) are members of healthcare teams that are integrated in, and often share language, beliefs, and lived experiences with their communities. They use their formal and informal social networks to promote healthy behavior, to connect community members to resources, and to build more resilient community networks. We propose a framework to conceptualize CHW interventions aiming to operationalize and optimize CHW social relations and networks.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!