Head-to-Head Comparison of Dual-Source and Split-Beam Filter Multi-Energy CT versus SPECT/CT for Assessing Lobar Lung Perfusion in Emphysema.

Purpose: To evaluate dual-source and split-beam filter multi-energy chest CT in assessing pulmonary perfusion on a lobar level in patients with lung emphysema, using perfusion SPECT as the reference standard.

Materials And Methods: Patients with emphysema evaluated for lung volume reduction therapy between May 2016 and February 2021 were retrospectively included. All patients underwent SPECT and either dual-source or split-beam filter (SBF) multi-energy CT. To calculate the fractional lobar lung perfusion (FLLP), SPECT acquisitions were co-registered with chest CT scans (hereafter, SPECT/CT) and semi-manually segmented. For multi-energy CT scans, lung lobes were automatically segmented using a U-Net model. Segmentations were manually verified. The FLLP was derived from iodine maps computed from the multi-energy data. Statistical analysis included Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis.

Results: Fifty-nine patients (30 male, 29 female; 31 underwent dual-source CT, 28 underwent SBF CT; mean age for all patients, 67 years ± 8 [SD]) were included. Both multi-energy methods significantly correlated with the SPECT/CT acquisitions for all individual lobes ( < .001). Pearson correlation concerning all lobes combined was significantly better for dual-source ( = 0.88) than for SBF multi-energy CT ( = 0.78; = .006). On the level of single lobes, Pearson correlation coefficient differed for the right upper lobe only (dual-source CT, = 0.88; SBF CT, = 0.58; = .008).

Conclusion: Dual-source and SBF multi-energy CT accurately assessed lung perfusion on a lobar level in patients with emphysema compared with SPECT/CT. The overall correlation was higher for dual-source multi-energy CT. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Comparative Studies, Computer Applications, CT Spectral Imaging, Image Postprocessing, Lung, Pulmonary Perfusion© RSNA, 2023.