AI Article Synopsis

  • Both schizophrenia (SCZ) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) exhibit mentalizing difficulties, but the effects of mentalization-based treatment (MBT) differ between these disorders.
  • A study assessed mentalizing capacity in 26 SCZ and 28 BPD patients before and after an 18-month MBT program using the thematic apperception test.
  • Results indicated that BPD patients showed significant improvement in mentalizing skills, like understanding social causality and emotional investment in relationships, while SCZ patients who received MBT only improved in understanding social causality compared to those who did not receive the treatment.

Article Abstract

Introduction: There is robust evidence that both patients with schizophrenia (SCZ) and borderline personality disorder (BPD) display mentalizing difficulties. Less is known however about differences in the way mentalization based treatment (MBT) impacts mentalizing capacity in SCZ and BPD patients. This study compares the impact of MBT on mentalizing capacity in individuals with SCZ and BPD.

Method: The thematic apperception test was used to measure mentalizing capacity. It was administered at the beginning and end of treatment to 26 patients with SCZ and 28 patients with BPD who enrolled in an 18-month long MBT program. For comparison a sample of 28 SCZ patients who did not receive MBT was also included. Using the social cognition and object-relations system, these narratives were analyzed and scored. Missing data was imputed and analyzed using intention-to-treat ANCOVAs with post-treatment measures of mentalizing capacity as dependent variables, group type as independent variable and baseline mentalizing capacities as covariates.

Results: Results showed that patients with BPD showed significantly more improvement on several measures of mentalizing, including complexity of representation (η = 0.50,  < 0.001), understanding of social causality (η = 0.41,  < 0.001) and emotional investment in relationships (η = 0.41,  < 0.001) compared to patients with SCZ who received MBT. No differences were found regarding affect-tone of relationships (η = 0.04,  = 0.36). SCZ patients who received MBT showed greater performance on understanding of social causality (η = 0.12,  = 0.01) compared to SCZ patients who did not receive MBT, but no differences were observed on complexity of representations, capacity for emotional investment or affect-tone of relationships.

Discussion: Patients with BPD performed better after receiving MBT on three dimensions of mentalizing capacity than SCZ patients who received MBT. Remarkably, SCZ patients who received MBT performed better on one dimension of mentalizing capacity compared to SCZ patients who did not receive MBT. Whereas MBT for BPD clearly involves improvement on most aspects of mentalizing, MBT for SCZ seems to thwart a further decline of other-oriented, cognitive mentalizing. Treatment goals should be adapted toward these disorder-specific characteristics.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10485774PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1226507DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mentalizing capacity
16
mentalization based
8
based treatment
8
treatment patients
8
borderline personality
8
personality disorder
8
scz patients
8
patients bpd
8
measures mentalizing
8
patients
7

Similar Publications

Background: Transgender and nonbinary individuals have received increasing attention within HIV research, with studies documenting the pervasive role stigma plays in creating and sustaining health inequities. However, the proliferation of HIV stigma research with this population has also raised concerns about research practices that may unintentionally stigmatize or retraumatize the very communities they are designed to benefit. Conducting stigma research is critical for generating accurate information about HIV epidemiology, risk and protective factors, and intervention strategies for transgender and nonbinary individuals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and subsequent post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) often impair daily activities and mental health (MH), which contribute to long-term TBI-related disability. PTE also affects driving capacity, which impacts functional independence, community participation, and satisfaction with life (SWL). However, studies evaluating the collective impact of PTE on multidimensional outcomes are lacking.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cancer and its treatments significantly affect the quality of life (QoL) of patients. This remains understudied among Vietnamese women with cancer.

Objectives: This study explored the QoL of Vietnamese women with cancer and identified key influencing factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Intrinsic capacity (IC), a crucial indicator for the United Nations Decade of Healthy Ageing 2021-2030, is defined by WHO as the foundation of functional ability, representing the composite of all physical and mental capacities of an individual. IC spans five function domains: Locomotor, psychological, cognitive, vitality, and sensory (including vision and hearing). Accurate IC assessment is vital for effective interventions, yet comparative analyses of these tools are scarce.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To systematically evaluate the effects of mind-body exercise on physical ability, mental health and quality of life in stroke patients.

Methods: According to the PRISMA statement, we searched Web of science, Pubmed, Embase, Sinomed, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases to collect randomized controlled trials on the effects of mind-body exercise on improving balance function, motor capacity, walking function, depression and quality of life in stroke patients. The search was conducted in January 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!