Similar return to sport between double cortical button and docking techniques for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in baseball players.

Background And Hypothesis: A double cortical button technique for ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction (UCLR) has advantages including significant control over graft tensioning, less concern about graft length, and minimized risk of bone tunnel fracture compared with traditional UCLR techniques. This double cortical button technique was recently found to be noninferior in mechanical performance to the traditional docking technique regarding joint strength, joint stiffness, and graft strain. However, clinical outcomes have not been compared between these UCLR techniques. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether baseball players who underwent UCLR with a double cortical button (double button) technique have similar return-to-sport (RTS) outcomes to baseball players who underwent UCLR with the traditional docking (docking) technique.

Materials And Methods: Baseball players who underwent primary UCLR from 2011 to 2020 across 2 institutions were identified. Included patients were contacted to complete a follow-up survey evaluating reoperations, RTS, and functional outcome scores. Functional outcome surveys include the Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic score, the Conway-Jobe score, the Andrews-Timmerman elbow score, and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score.

Results: Overall, 78 male baseball players (age: 18.9 ± 2.4 years) with an average follow-up of 3.1 ± 2.4 years were evaluated, with 73 of the players being baseball pitchers. Players in the double button group more frequently received palmaris longus autografts (78% vs. 30%) and less frequently received gracilis autografts (22% vs. 58%) compared with players in the docking group (P = .001); however, all other demographic factors were similar between the groups. All players in the double button group were able to RTS in 11.1 ± 2.6 months, whereas 96% of players in the docking group were able to RTS in 13.5 ± 3.4 months (P > .05). All postoperative outcomes and patient-reported outcomes were statistically similar between the groups and remained similar after isolating pitchers only and after separating partial-thickness from full-thickness UCL tears (all P > .05).

Conclusion: RTS and other postoperative outcomes may be similar between baseball players who underwent UCLR with the double button technique and the docking technique. Although future research may be necessary to strengthen clinical recommendations, these findings provide the first clinical outcomes in light of a recent cadaveric study finding similar elbow strength, joint stiffness, and graft strain compared with the docking technique.