Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The records of 140 patients with histologically verified Ewing's sarcoma of bone treated between 1969 and 1982 were studied retrospectively. Various factors thought to be relevant to prognosis were analyzed. Three statistically significant factors were found: presence of metastatic disease, elevation of the sedimentation rate, and location of the tumor in the pelvis. In addition, patients who underwent complete surgical excision of the primary lesion had a better survival rate (74% at 5 years) than those who did not (34% at 5 years). It is concluded that patients with surgically accessible lesions should undergo treatment consisting of surgery, chemotherapy, and, in selected cases, radiation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19861201)58:11<2551::aid-cncr2820581132>3.0.co;2-y | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!