Background: Nurse educators at a public university expanded their standardized examination program in Spring 2020 to include more specialty examinations, required remediation, and retesting for students who did not attain benchmark scores. This study conducted a remediation-focused program evaluation.
Method: A mixed-methods design was used. Aggregated deidentified Health Education Systems, Inc. (HESI) specialty examination scores ( = 907) were analyzed. Feedback from nursing students and recent alumni ( = 70) was collected using a Qualtrics survey.
Results: For students scoring under benchmark, higher remediation time requirements led to greater increases in second-attempt specialty examination scores. More alumni than current students reported remediation was helpful ( = .029). Participants' perspectives regarding remediation barriers, helpful strategies, and motivating policies were identified. Five themes emerged from open-ended survey comments, adding depth to the quantitative findings.
Conclusion: Recommendations for standardized examination remediation strategies and policies are offered. .
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20230712-09 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!