Background: Nurse educators at a public university expanded their standardized examination program in Spring 2020 to include more specialty examinations, required remediation, and retesting for students who did not attain benchmark scores. This study conducted a remediation-focused program evaluation.

Method: A mixed-methods design was used. Aggregated deidentified Health Education Systems, Inc. (HESI) specialty examination scores ( = 907) were analyzed. Feedback from nursing students and recent alumni ( = 70) was collected using a Qualtrics survey.

Results: For students scoring under benchmark, higher remediation time requirements led to greater increases in second-attempt specialty examination scores. More alumni than current students reported remediation was helpful ( = .029). Participants' perspectives regarding remediation barriers, helpful strategies, and motivating policies were identified. Five themes emerged from open-ended survey comments, adding depth to the quantitative findings.

Conclusion: Recommendations for standardized examination remediation strategies and policies are offered. .

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20230712-09DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

examination remediation
8
standardized examination
8
specialty examination
8
examination scores
8
remediation
6
examination
5
standardized nursing
4
nursing examination
4
remediation program
4
program evaluation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!