Background: Effective therapeutics given early to high-risk ambulatory patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) could improve outcomes and reduce overall healthcare burden. However, conducting site visits in non-hospitalised patients, who should remain isolated, is problematic.

Aim: To evaluate the feasibility of a purely remote (virtual) study in non-hospitalised patients with COVID-19; and the efficacy and safety of nebulised recombinant interferon-β1a (SNG001) in this setting.

Design & Setting: Randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study, which was conducted remotely.

Method: Eligible patients aged ≥65 years (or ≥50 years with risk factors) with COVID-19 and not requiring hospital admission were recruited remotely. They were randomised to SNG001 or placebo once-daily via nebuliser for 14 days. The main outcomes were assessments of feasibility and safety, which were all conducted remotely.

Results: Of 114 patients treated, 111 (97.4%) completed 28 days of follow-up. Overall compliance to study medication was high, with ≥13 doses taken by 89.7% and 92.9% of treated patients in the placebo and SNG001 groups, respectively. Over the course of the study, only two patients were hospitalised, both in the placebo group; otherwise there were no notable differences between treatments for the efficacy parameters. No patients withdrew owing to an adverse event, and a similar proportion of patients experienced on-treatment adverse events in the two treatment groups (64.3% and 67.2% with SNG001 and placebo, respectively); most were mild or moderate and not treatment-related.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that it is feasible to conduct a purely virtual study in community-based patients with COVID-19, when the study included detailed daily assessments and with medication administered via nebuliser.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11176681PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0089DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients
10
study
8
non-hospitalised patients
8
virtual study
8
patients covid-19
8
sng001 placebo
8
sng001
5
covid-19
5
feasibility administration
4
administration nebulised
4

Similar Publications

Magic in a bottle? A Focused review of factor concentrates for the intraoperative treatment of acquired coagulopathy - Fibrinogen concentrate, prothrombin complex concentrate, and recombinant activated factor VII.

Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol

December 2023

Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Sinai Health System, Women's College Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Goal-directed administration of blood components including red cells, platelets, plasma, and factor concentrates plays a critical role in the management of intraoperative coagulopathy. Increasingly commonly used, purified and recombinant factor concentrates are being recognized for their logistical advantages and potentially superior efficacy. Three- and four-factor prothrombin concentrates, fibrinogen concentrates and activated factor VII have an evolving evidence base relative to frozen plasma and cryoprecipitate.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

ESAs in perioperative anemia management: Who, what, how and why?

Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol

December 2023

Université d'Angers, Département Anesthésie Réanimation, CHU Angers, Angers, France; Université d'Angers, UMR CNRS 6015, Inserm U1083, Unité MitoVasc, Team Carme, Angers, France.

Preoperative anemia is frequent and is associated with poor patient outcomes and higher transfusion rates. Perioperative blood transfusion is also associated with poor outcomes. These observations justify efforts to increase hemoglobin levels in anemic patients before surgeries with a moderate to high bleeding risk.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Does patient blood management represent good value for money?

Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol

December 2023

Transfusion Research Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia; Department of Clinical Haematology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia. Electronic address:

Patient blood management is the umbrella term for a suite of initiatives designed to optimise blood product usage, minimise transfusion needs, and ensure appropriate and evidence-based transfusion practices. In this review we summarise published economic evaluations of patient blood management to determine whether they represent good value for money. We identified 54 economic evaluations of patient blood management, the majority of which had positive cost-effectiveness conclusions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Preoperative iron therapy: Where are we?

Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol

December 2023

School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Preoperative anemia affects one-third of patients undergoing major surgery and is associated with worse perioperative and postoperative outcomes; including length of hospital stay, allogeneic blood transfusion, morbidity, and mortality. Iron deficiency is the most common cause of anemia, and associative data suggests that preoperative correction of iron deficiency anemia could improve postoperative patient outcomes. However, data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) do not appear to support the routine use of iron therapy to treat preoperative anemia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Does one unit really matter? Immunological effects of transfusion after universal leucodepletion.

Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol

December 2023

Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA; Anesthesiology and Surgical Oncology Research Group, USA. Electronic address:

Patients with cancer who receive allogeneic red blood cell transfusions are at risk of adverse reactions of varying severity. One of these reactions is immunomodulation, also known as transfusion-related immunomodulation. With the exact mechanism of transfusion related immunomodulation being unclear, storage lesions (both the cellular and cytokine component) are considered a major contributor.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!