A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Epicardial fat in patients with metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. | LitMetric

Purpose: Abnormally increased epicardial fat appears to be associated with an additional risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in the context of metabolic syndrome (MetS). However, evidence on the relationship between epicardial fat volumes (EFVs), epicardial fat thickness (EFT) and MetS remains inconsistent.

Methods: Specific searches of electronic databases from 1 January 2000 to 31 October 2022 were independently performed by two researchers. In this study, two quantification measures of epicardial fat were included: comparison of total computed tomography-based EFVs and EFT between two groups (individuals with and without MetS), estimating standardized mean difference (SMD) with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) through a random-effects model analysis. The heterogeneity in the included studies was explored by meta-regression and subgroup analyses.

Results: The EFVs were significantly increased in MetS subjects compared with non-MetS subjects (SMD: 1.07, 95 % CI: 0.69-1.45, p < 0.001), and the EFT was also significantly larger in MetS patients than in the Non-MetS (SMD: 1.12, 95 % CI: 0.84-1.41, p < 0.001). We compared the Caucasian and American subgroups with the Asian and African subgroups, and the EFT was greater in the former subgroups (SMD: 1.32, 95 % CI: 0.44-2.20, p < 0.001). When comparing the EFT among the age subgroups, there was a significant SMD between adolescents and adults or elderly individuals (SMD: 1.21, 95 % CI: 0.84-1.52, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: MetS patients tend to present greater EFT near the right ventricular free wall and greater total EFVs. Increased epicardial fat, an imaging biomarker, independently affects the onset of MetS.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111056DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

epicardial fat
20
metabolic syndrome
8
epicardial
5
fat patients
4
patients metabolic
4
syndrome systematic
4
systematic review
4
review meta-analysis
4
meta-analysis purpose
4
purpose abnormally
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!