Background: Penile size is considered a symbol of manhood and is a subjective problem for men, especially those with small penis syndrome. Penile augmentation was introduced to correct penile size problems from a medical, psychological, or esthetic point of view. Hyaluronic acid (HA) and polylactic acid (PLA) are two types of augmentation agents that are popularly used today. However, no systematic studies and meta-analyses have compared these two modalities as penile augmentation agents. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of penile filler injections with HA compared to PLA.

Methods: This study was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles examining the differences in efficacy and adverse events of the administration of HA and PLA in patients undergoing penile augmentation were systematically reviewed from the PubMed, Proquest, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. An odds ratio with a 95% CI was applied to measure the study outcome. The analysis was performed with RevMan 5.4 software. The risk of bias for each study was evaluated using the Risk of Bias v2 instrument from Cochrane. This research protocol is registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registry.

Result: Four articles consisting of 283 research subjects were included in this study. The meta-analysis for penile girth enhancement after penile augmentation found significant results in the HA group compared to the PLA group (=0.01). There was no difference in the level of satisfaction with penile appearance 4 weeks after penile augmentation in the HA group compared to the PLA group (=0.79). HA was significantly superior in sexual satisfaction 12 weeks postpenile augmentation (=0.0004). There was no difference in the incidence of pain after penile augmentation in the HA group compared to the PLA group (=0.33). In the postaugmentation penile inflammation, there was no difference (=0.98) in the HA group compared to the PLA group.

Conclusion: There are differences in the efficacy of penile augmentation with the superiority of HA in increasing penile diameter and postaugmentation sexual satisfaction compared to PLA. There was no difference in the incidence of complications between using HA and PLA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10473315PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MS9.0000000000001094DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

penile augmentation
32
compared pla
20
group compared
16
penile
15
augmentation group
12
pla group
12
augmentation
10
hyaluronic acid
8
acid polylactic
8
polylactic acid
8

Similar Publications

A 14-year-old boy developed hydronephrosis and worsening renal function due to fibroepithelial polyps of the bladder and left ureter at the age of 12 years. The endoscopic treatment of ureteral polyps was attempted by his previous doctor; however urethral stricture and ureteral stricture developed and was untreatable. Therefore, he was referred to our hospital for further reconstructive treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Although failures are undesirable, they offer valuable learning opportunities that drive progress through necessary changes. This concept holds particularly true in the history of urethral reconstruction.

Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, focusing on the history of the urethral stricture and current trends based on national and international guidelines for urethral stricture management.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Genitourinary cancers affect over 480,000 patients in the United States annually. While promising therapeutic modalities continue to emerge, notably immune checkpoint inhibitors, molecular targeted therapies, antibody-drug conjugates, and radioligand therapies, these treatments are associated with a spectrum of adverse side-effects, including ophthalmologic toxicities. In this review, we cover the most commonly used antineoplastic agents for the kidneys, bladder, urinary tracts, prostate, testis, and penis, detailing mechanism, indication, and recent trials supporting their use.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study discusses alternatives to buccal mucosa for reconstructive surgery in complex urethral strictures, given situations where buccal grafts may be inadequate or inappropriate.
  • A 57-year-old male patient with a urethral stricture underwent urethroplasty utilizing a new VIVENDI graft, which is aldehyde-free, alongside a surgical technique involving a dorsal inlay.
  • Post-surgery, the patient experienced no complications and reported satisfactory voiding, with follow-up planned for three months to assess recovery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Injection of various substances into the penis for augmentation is an uncommon and concerning practice that can have serious consequences, such as skin necrosis, ulcers, suboptimal cosmetic results, and persistent edema, often requiring extensive surgical repair. In this article, we present a rare case of penile self-injection with Kanamycin ointment. We describe the clinical course of the disease and the management framework that was followed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!