Cardiac and extra-cardiac side effects of common antiarrhythmic agents might be related to drug-induced mitochondrial dysfunction. Supratherapeutic doses of amiodarone have been shown to impair mitochondria in animal studies, whilst influence of propafenone on cellular bioenergetics is unknown. We aimed to assess effects of protracted exposure to pharmacologically relevant doses of amiodarone and propafenone on cellular bioenergetics and mitochondrial biology of human and mouse cardiomyocytes. In this study, HL-1 mouse atrial cardiomyocytes and primary human cardiomyocytes derived from the ventricles of the adult heart were exposed to 2 and 7 μg/mL of either amiodarone or propafenone. After 24 h, extracellular flux analysis and confocal laser scanning microscopy were used to measure mitochondrial functions. Autophagy was assessed by western blots and live-cell imaging of lysosomes. In human cardiomyocytes, amiodarone significantly reduced mitochondrial membrane potential and ATP production, in association with an inhibition of fatty acid oxidation and impaired complex I- and II-linked respiration in the electron transport chain. Expectedly, this led to increased anaerobic glycolysis. Amiodarone increased the production of reactive oxygen species and autophagy was also markedly affected. In contrast, propafenone-exposed cardiomyocytes did not exert any impairment of cellular bioenergetics. Similar changes after amiodarone treatment were observed during identical experiments performed on HL-1 mouse cardiomyocytes, suggesting a comparable pharmacodynamics of amiodarone among mammalian species. In conclusion, amiodarone but not propafenone in near-therapeutic concentrations causes a pattern of mitochondrial dysfunction with affected autophagy and metabolic switch from oxidative metabolism to anaerobic glycolysis in human cardiomyocytes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2023.116676 | DOI Listing |
Background: This study investigated drug-drug interactions in patients with atrial fibrillation taking both a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and an antiarrhythmic drug.
Methods And Results: Using data from the National Health Insurance database (2012-2018), we identified 78 805 patients with atrial fibrillation on DOACs, with 24 142 taking amiodarone, 8631 taking propafenone, 2784 taking dronedarone, 297 taking flecainide, 177 taking sotalol, and 42 772 on DOACs alone. Patients with bradycardia, heart block, heart failure, mitral stenosis, prosthetic valves, or incomplete data were excluded.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol
December 2024
Department of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Background And Objective: Treating recurrent atrial arrhythmias after persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) ablation is often challenging. This single-center, prospective study aimed to observe the effectiveness of different combinations of oral antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in reverting to sinus rhythm (SR) in patients with recurrent atrial arrhythmias after PeAF ablation.
Methods: Forty-five patients who experienced recurrent atrial arrhythmias after PeAF ablation were included.
Medicina (Kaunas)
September 2024
Dental-Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Dunărea de Jos" University, 800008 Galati, Romania.
: New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is a common cardiac condition often observed in intensive care units. When amiodarone is used to treat this condition, either to maintain sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion or to control heart rate, complications can arise when a systemic pathology is present. Systemic pathology can result in a decrease in cardiac output and blood pressure, making the management of NOAF and septic shock challenging.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Cardiol
August 2024
Centre for Chronic & Complex Care Research, Blacktown Hospital, Western Sydney Local Health District, Blacktown, New South Wales, Australia.
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and obesity coexist in approximately 37.6 million and 650 million people globally, respectively. The anatomical and physiological changes in individuals with obesity may influence the pharmacokinetic properties of drugs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJACC Adv
August 2024
Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of hospital admission, but few data on reasons for hospitalization and on the role of anti-arrhythmic drugs are available.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence rate and factors associated with all-cause, cardiovascular, and AF-related hospitalizations.
Methods: Prospective ongoing ATHERO-AF (Atherosclerosis in Atrial Fibrillation) cohort study enrolling AF patients on oral anticoagulants.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!