Temporal validation and updating of a prediction model for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus.

J Clin Epidemiol

Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia; Diabetes and Endocrinology Units, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia. Electronic address:

Published: December 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • The original Monash gestational diabetes risk prediction model has been validated and updated for use in a current population, improving its accuracy and relevance.
  • The study used data from singleton pregnancies in Melbourne (2016-2018) to assess various predictors like age, BMI, and ethnicity to enhance the model.
  • The updated model showed better predictive performance (c-statistic of 0.732) compared to the original, emphasizing the importance of continuously refining prediction tools for effective prenatal care.

Article Abstract

Objective: The original Monash gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) risk prediction in early pregnancy model is internationally externally validated and clinically implemented. We temporally validate and update this model in a contemporary population with a universal screening context and revised diagnostic criteria and ethnicity categories, thereby improving model performance and generalizability.

Study Design And Setting: The updating dataset comprised of routinely collected health data for singleton pregnancies delivered in Melbourne, Australia from 2016 to 2018. Model predictors included age, body mass index, ethnicity, diabetes family history, GDM history, and poor obstetric outcome history. Model updating methods were recalibration-in-the-large (Model A), intercept and slope re-estimation (Model B), and coefficient revision using logistic regression (Model C1, original ethnicity categories; Model C2, revised ethnicity categories). Analysis included 10-fold cross-validation, assessment of performance measures (c-statistic, calibration-in-the-large, calibration slope, and expected-observed ratio), and a closed-loop testing procedure to compare models' log-likelihood and akaike information criterion scores.

Results: In 26,474 singleton pregnancies (4,756, 18% with GDM), the original model demonstrated reasonable temporal validation (c-statistic = 0.698) but suboptimal calibration (expected-observed ratio = 0.485). Updated model C2 was preferred, with a high c-statistic (0.732) and significantly better performance in closed testing.

Conclusion: We demonstrated updating methods to sustain predictive performance in a contemporary population, highlighting the value and versatility of prediction models for guiding risk-stratified GDM care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.08.020DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

model
12
ethnicity categories
12
temporal validation
8
gestational diabetes
8
diabetes mellitus
8
contemporary population
8
singleton pregnancies
8
updating methods
8
updating
4
validation updating
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!