A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Reproducibility of transthoracic 3D echocardiography in the assessment of mitral valve area in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis: real time versus ECG-gated 3D echocardiography. | LitMetric

Purpose: To assess reproducibility of Real time 3D echocardiography (RT3D) and ECG-gated 3D echocardiography (EG3D) when measuring the mitral valve area (MVA) in rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS).

Methods: MVA was assessed by three operators in 68 MS patients using RT3D and EG3D. Reproducibility of each technique was determined by calculating the standard error of measurements (SEM).

Results: SEM was similar between RT3D and EG3D. MVA variability was of 0.4 cm² or 30% of any RT3D or EG3D measured MVA. The minimal change in MVA above which two measurements should be considered to differ significantly for the same operator was of 0.4 cm² for RT3D and 0.5 cm² for EG3D. For two different operators making successive measurements, the minimum significant change was of 0.5 cm² for RT3D and 0.6 cm² for EG3D. The minimum significant difference when switching from RT3D to EG3D or vice versa is of 0.6 cm². Low temporal resolution of 6 Hz has the least variability when using RT3D (0.19 cm² vs. 0.26 cm², p = 0.009) but significantly underestimated MVA (1.3 ± 0.4 cm² vs. 1.4 ± 0.4 cm², p < 10) when compared to EG3D. MVA variability was significantly higher in mild MS when compared to severe MS whether it is RT3D (0.23 cm² vs. 0.18 cm², p = 0.02) or EG3D (0.27 cm² vs. 0.16 cm², p < 0.001).

Conclusion: RT3D and EG3D are equally reproducible in the assessment of MVA in patients with MS. Further measurements standardization is required to have a clinically acceptable estimations of the true 3D MVA and minimal detectable differences.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02939-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rt3d eg3d
16
mitral valve
8
valve area
8
rheumatic mitral
8
mitral stenosis
8
real time
8
ecg-gated echocardiography
8
rt3d
8
eg3d
7
mva
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!