A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Dynamic detection of ppb-level SO based on a differential photoacoustic cell coupled with UV-LED. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • A new photoacoustic sensor for monitoring sulfur oxides (SO) has been developed, combining a differential photoacoustic cell with an affordable UV-LED for high sensitivity at the ppb level.
  • To overcome issues with UV-LED light divergence, a lens-based combination module was designed, achieving a PA signal that was 20 times stronger than without the lens.
  • The sensor demonstrated exceptional performance with minimal background noise interference (1 ppm) and reached a detection limit of 1.3 ppb after averaging for 100 seconds.

Article Abstract

We design a photoacoustic (PA) SO sensor based on the coupling of a differential photoacoustic cell (DPAC) and cost-effective UV-LED, which realized the dynamic monitoring of SO gas at the ppb level. Aiming at the limitation of UV-LED divergence, a light source combination module with high condensing efficiency was devised based on a lens through theoretical derivation and experimental analysis. The PA signal with the optimum matching of the lens was 20-times larger than the direct coupling of the UV-LED. Due to the excellent beam collimation effect of the lens assembly, the background interference was only 1 ppm. In addition, the DPAC gathered the merits of doubling the PA signal and reducing the flow noise interference. The analysis of Allan-Werle deviation showed that the detection limit of SO was 1.3 ppb with the averaging time of 100 s.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.498908DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

differential photoacoustic
8
photoacoustic cell
8
dynamic detection
4
detection ppb-level
4
ppb-level based
4
based differential
4
cell coupled
4
uv-led
4
coupled uv-led
4
uv-led design
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!