Toward Benchmark-Quality Predictions for 3d Transition Metal Electrocatalysts: A Comparison of CCSD(T) and ph-AFQMC.

Generating accurate ionization energies for transition metal complexes is an important step toward the accurate computational description of their electrocatalytic reactions. Benchmark-quality data is required for testing existing theoretical methods and developing new ones but is complicated to obtain for many transition metal compounds due to the potential presence of both strong dynamical and static electron correlation. In this regime, it is questionable whether the so-called gold standard, coupled cluster with singles, doubles, and perturbative triples (CCSD(T)), provides the desired level of accuracy─roughly 1-3 kcal/mol. In this work, we compiled a test set of 28 3d metal-containing molecules relevant to homogeneous electrocatalysis (termed 3dTMV) and computed their vertical ionization energies (ionization potentials) with CCSD(T) and phaseless auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (ph-AFQMC) in the def2-SVP basis set. A substantial effort has been made to converge away the phaseless bias in the ph-AFQMC reference values. We assess a wide variety of multireference diagnostics and find that spin-symmetry breaking of the CCSD wave function and the PBE0 density functional correlate well with our analysis of multiconfigurational wave functions. We propose quantitative criteria based on symmetry breaking to delineate correlation regimes inside of which appropriately performed CCSD(T) can produce mean absolute deviations from the ph-AFQMC reference values of roughly 2 kcal/mol or less and outside of which CCSD(T) is expected to fail. We also present a preliminary assessment of density functional theory (DFT) functionals on the 3dTMV set.